Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Got bored after a few minutes of that. Trying to compare sterling’s wages to Sane and Jesus wages is funny. One has just came from Brazil where he probably wasn’t even on 10k p/w and Sane was pretty much unknown in England. Pretty sure Jesus is getting a pay rise to about 100k p/w, I’m guessing Sane will get a rise soon. Same for Ederson, he was barely known before we signed him and Bravo was a starter for Barca and Chile’s captain, of course Bravo’s starting wage would be higher. He’s completely missing the point, which is a common theme in this Sanchez saga. His wage demands went up after supposedly agreeing a deal with City. Them wage demands would make him the highest paid city player by 100k+ p/w. Considering how we’ve performed this season and the closeness of the City squad, that is wrong. I’d say the only player in world football that is worth breaking any sort of wage structure we supposedly have is Messi, probably Neymar too. Isn’t he wrong about Yaya’s wages too? He’s out of contract this summer so how can his newly reduced weekly wage come into action then? Pretty sure his wages would have been reduced when he signed a new contract last summer.
City fans claiming Sanchez is a mercenary is a bit rich, I’ll admit it. I’ve even said it and cringed at it, considering we’ve had dozens of players signing for us mainly because of money over the past 10 years. But United fans can’t accept he’s joined United because he got offered more money there. They’ve signed a world class player, so I wouldn’t give a toss arguing about weather he’s signed because of more money or not. Just makes me laugh when they try to deny he’s signed for more money.