Alexis Sanchez

Status
Not open for further replies.
One of them is John Cross who is a bullshitter with no credibility.

The other is Simon Mullock, who is 100% iron clad and has been leaked this by City directly.
I get that, but why is cross reporting it without saying to his colleague I've heard this can you find out from your end if it's true.
Just making himself look stupid if it's wrong
 
Would have felt a little better if Mullock had said "Sterling is staying". Maybe we didnt offer him in swap but we've not said we wont agree to do it.....depends how badly Pep wants Sanchez?
 
It is clear that they began to negotiate

Today is being negotiated - Tomorrow is confirmed

Sterling will not be in the agreement

End of the drama
 
This whole rumour has to be bullshit.

There is no way city would be stupid enough to offer a young, yet to fully develop English player plus a wedge of cash for a 29 year old who can sign for free in a few months.

Surely not.

If by some fluke it were to happen then whomever signed off on the deal (and that would have to include Pep) should be dismissed the very same day.

But Pep isn't a fool so stop the panicking this deal will not be even being considered.

It's the media being twats for a change.
 
The figures dont add up for a swap deal, I think we all agree on that.

Out of interest, if we buy Sanchez (cash deal) and Arsenal then come back with a cash bid for Sterling, what amount (if any) would you sell him for?

Has to be over 100 mil.

England international, 22, regular Champions League player, just started in preference to Sergio Aguero by Pep Guardiola.
 
So a bloke at the Mirror, announces that his own paper's story, is a load of fucking bollocks.

Fair play to him, but what does that say about the rest ?
Mullock is a pretty senior correspondent with serious links to the club. Barely ever tweets anything club related. I only trust him and Martin Blackburn as far as club sources are concerned. Robson, Ducker, John Cross and the rest are bullshit peddlers who get more wrong than right.
 
The figures dont add up for a swap deal, I think we all agree on that.

Out of interest, if we buy Sanchez (cash deal) and Arsenal then come back with a cash bid for Sterling, what amount (if any) would you sell him for?
That's what I was thinking. For me, it only gets interesting if an offer of £80m comes in and then, only if we have a replacement that the manager really fancies lined up.
 
Doesn't he make you fucking throw up.

What a shite excuse for a journalist.

He's unprofessional.

At the end of the day he's a United fan writing about one of the two teams he hates the most.

Imagine a Madrid fan was the local reporter for Barcelona. That's the situation.

However, I'd like to think that if I was the local United reporter, I'd do my best to do a good impartial job.
 
Anyone who actually bought into James "the rag" Robson's wumming should know for the future not to pay that insufferable twerp any mind.

Similar, John Cross is a con man and the mindless British press who ape his revelations continue to get away with it. James Olley, a trusted Arsenal source, and now Mullock (gets his info directly from City) have both said it's BS. Hope that's enough for people to calm down and realize how stupid this whole thing was and how foolish we were to buy into it.
 
How is giving away one of our most promising players, who we have been improving for the last two years building for the future? It's the direct opposite.

It's called bullshit. Not everything you ready on the newspaper is true...you do realise that right?
 
Mullock is a pretty senior correspondent with serious links to the club. Barely ever tweets anything club related. I only trust him and Martin Blackburn as far as club sources are concerned. Robson, Ducker, John Cross and the rest are bullshit peddlers who get more wrong than right.
Mirror and Sunday Mirror are separate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top