BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 36,834
Look, I don't have a problem with Dylan's voice/singing -- I like (love) Sleater-Kinney FFS, and if you don't like Dylan's voice you would run screaming from Corin Tucker's. I have a problem with the MUSIC on side one (the "electric" side). Hard to believe this was considered a betrayal of folk ideals at the time -- it's actually a betrayal of group dynamics. These are poems set to music, but not really -- they're poems set to chords and drumbeats and random harp blowing and ragged bluesy yammering. It's mushy, and it's boring. Now these might be wonderful poems to those to whom they speak -- which isn't me -- but even I can recognize creative genius when I read it. But are there any hooks? No. Is there any innovation whatsoever to the backbeat? No. Do the songs all sound the same? No, but then again, yes.
Onto the folk side . . . and I'm just going to say it: "Mr. Tambourine Man" was done MUCH better by the Byrds (sorry, purists). But after that, this is pretty great stuff -- especially "It's Alright Ma (I'm Only Bleeding)" which can't be described any way but moving and beautiful.
How do you grade this then? It's like an antique shop -- in more ways than one, since all this shit is older than I am -- but there are some remarkable treasures and some real junk. One the one hand this is ambient music -- a record to put on in the background while I do emails or wash the pots. On another hand -- this is folk hip-hop. Which is something. But not really my thing.
I'd say "Subterranean Homesick Blues" is 8/10, the rest of the electric stuff 3/10, and the acoustic stuff 7/10. So call it 6/10 leaning to 7 but not leaning hard enough.
superb stuff FogBlue - great write up. i can see many of your points despite this being one of my favourite albums.