Andrew Marr

I agree to disagree too and understand your position but it's called kicking the can down the road.

Local increase in employment is not a good enough excuse to undermine our own position on carbon reduction and avoid extinction level climate change events. They can have concessions and an alternative industry with green credentials could be located there instead.
Sorry to jump in and take the thread away from Andrew Marr but this climate extinction Schtick is just that. A schtick.

THe whole climate thing is being used as a means to tax working people back into servitude. We are being taxed out of our own vehicles, taxed out of keeping our homes warm, and taxed out of our well earned holidays In the sun.

Now we have a former labour leader arguing against opening a coal mine in an economically depressed region in order to boost his middle class credentials.

The solution to climate change is simple.

You want less cars in cities? Close ¾ of the car parks and increase levels of public transport. This wouldn’t dramatically increase the tax take but it would absolutely reduce the cars on the road.
Less flights? Reduce the landing spots at British airports. Same again, won’t increase taxes but will reduce Consumption.

That’s what govts say they want isn’t it? Less cars and planes on the road and in the air? This would achieve that without smashing peoples taxes up.

It’s time for govts of all stripes to put their money where their mouths are. They wont though. The climate debate is purely a means to tax the air we breathe.
 
Suprise there Lisa Nandy on whether we should divert vaccine to India No we need to continue on our path
 
Suprise there Lisa Nandy on whether we should divert vaccine to India No we need to continue on our path

This is misleading. When asked whether we should pause or divert the vaccine program to younger adults she didn't say yes.

She said that we should send the 120 million surplus vaccine doses we have ordered- I have no idea if that is possible at the current time but it is quite different from what you think she said.
 
This is misleading. When asked whether we should pause or divert the vaccine program to younger adults she didn't say yes.

She said that we should send the 120 million surplus vaccine doses we have ordered- I have no idea if that is possible at the current time but it is quite different from what you think she said
Not misleading at all she comes on at 38 mins 50 she is asked the question twice and direct answer is no we should not pause vaccination of younger people. The surplus vaccines you mention are not yet manufactured and most aren't approved


The Andrew Marr Show, 02/05/2021: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000vt3g via @bbciplayer
 
Last edited:
Not misleading at all she comes on at 38 mins 50 she is asked the question twice and direct answer is no we should not pause vaccination of younger people. The surplus vaccines you mention are not yet manufactured and most aren't approved


The Andrew Marr Show, 02/05/2021: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000vt3g via @bbciplayer

Yes I have watched it myself already. Your original post doesn't tell the full story and has no punctuation in it so it is likely to be misread.
 
Goves certainly setting himslef up for a leadership challenge at some point.

Also did Marr just basically dismiss PR as strange and negative with that barb
 
Decades away from commercial scale

Not true. It can be done now. And now we're out of the EU we can invest in it and make sure 50% of all iron/steel used in the UK is made useng low CO2 steel within 10 years and 100% in 20.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.