manimanc
Well-Known Member
Surely you meant to say grammer?Not grammar.
Surely you meant to say grammer?Not grammar.
You must be related to Piers Morgan he has the same problem.
It is not an upfront payment or at least we wouldn't recognise it in that way.Silly me and a few others to mix up years. Question tho', we are not getting £45m from our current deal, are we? Thus this figure may contain an upfront payment on the signing of the new deal. Can anyone confirm or am I talking bollocks again?
Erm, no I don’t think so unless I’m being Clarkied?Surely you meant to say grammer?
I THOUGHT IT WAS 65 MIL£45m a year Puma deal, I thought it was more than that...
Blimey, that's fighting talk.
I couldn’t resist taking a peek at the sites for the Red Filth and the Anfield Road Formation Brick Throwers.. their usual internet warriors are all tuning up with a medley re-run of their greatest hits (‘Dirty Oil Money’, ‘Sports-washing’, ‘Empty Seats’ and so on, the hits just keep on coming..) Poor loves, like the Four Tops, they all keep going back to ‘The Same Old Song’.. (btw, no offence to the Tops, love their stuff!)I don't bother with RAWK. Nothing on Red Cafe as of a few minutes ago but I think they're all piling in on the Glazers and Woodward in another thread. And there's the rub - no doubt some of them will scoff at the "reality" of our figures when they get round to it but they should set all that bitter shite aside for a moment and weigh up the statements from the likes of Khaldoon/Soriano compared to Woodward yesterday. The former talks about the beautiful football, forward planning, and the success on the pitch as being a key factor in driving up revenues whereas the other doesn't seem to give a fuck about on-field performances
Look it up is their anything else youd like to know?Explaining the difference between your and you're, as I always find it a bit confusing.
Damn....nearly :)Erm, no I don’t think so unless I’m being Clarkied?