Another Guardiola Rumour - The Sun.

BillyShears said:
SWP's back said:
BobKowalski said:
Oh I don't know. Some perverse fascination on my part or perhaps to see if anyone has got anything fresh or new or enlightening to say on Mancini/Mourinho/Pep or whoever...

...and guess what. In 3 fucking years the argument has moved not an inch. The only change is the introduction of a new name like Pep or going forward someone like Klopp - although why we want a character from 'Allo, 'Allo is beyond me - but the argument itself hasn't changed even if the parameters have i.e. 'we will never win a big game with Mancini' to 'we will never win a trophy with Mancini' followed by 'we will never win the league with Mancini' and finally the last roll of the dice 'we will never win the CL with Mancini'...

And then we have my personal faves who after a conversation with Wimbly the fucking cat or whatever his fucking name is, pronounce with absolute certainty that we will see a new man in the summer. Nailed on. Mancini is toast. Deep pussy has given me the nod so pass the fucking bunting and get the punch bowl out...I mean okay law of fucking averages says that they are going to be right one day but so far the fucking Mayans have got more right then the Mancini out crowd.

So forgive me if I am a teensy bit bored with endless threads on Mancini's future every time we draw a game and endless debate on the merits or otherwise of Mourinho over Mancini where to be honest I have seen more cogent arguments on a Blur/Oasis thread on a teen girl forum..oh and FYI my user name is Jasmine so come and say hi sweet cheeks...

..christ showing my age on the Blur/Oasis line there
Excellent, I may repost it in a few threads. This deserves more recognition.

It isn't really going to change anyone's opinion or make them post less about Mancini. Still it seems to satisfy the angry Mancini must not be questioned brigade. I'd love to reply to him but in the interests of not wanting to incur the wrath of the moral majority and not be "provocative" I have to leave it.
Are you snubbing Bob, Billy?
 
BillyShears said:
SWP's back said:
BobKowalski said:
Oh I don't know. Some perverse fascination on my part or perhaps to see if anyone has got anything fresh or new or enlightening to say on Mancini/Mourinho/Pep or whoever...

...and guess what. In 3 fucking years the argument has moved not an inch. The only change is the introduction of a new name like Pep or going forward someone like Klopp - although why we want a character from 'Allo, 'Allo is beyond me - but the argument itself hasn't changed even if the parameters have i.e. 'we will never win a big game with Mancini' to 'we will never win a trophy with Mancini' followed by 'we will never win the league with Mancini' and finally the last roll of the dice 'we will never win the CL with Mancini'...

And then we have my personal faves who after a conversation with Wimbly the fucking cat or whatever his fucking name is, pronounce with absolute certainty that we will see a new man in the summer. Nailed on. Mancini is toast. Deep pussy has given me the nod so pass the fucking bunting and get the punch bowl out...I mean okay law of fucking averages says that they are going to be right one day but so far the fucking Mayans have got more right then the Mancini out crowd.

So forgive me if I am a teensy bit bored with endless threads on Mancini's future every time we draw a game and endless debate on the merits or otherwise of Mourinho over Mancini where to be honest I have seen more cogent arguments on a Blur/Oasis thread on a teen girl forum..oh and FYI my user name is Jasmine so come and say hi sweet cheeks...

..christ showing my age on the Blur/Oasis line there
Excellent, I may repost it in a few threads. This deserves more recognition.

It isn't really going to change anyone's opinion or make them post less about Mancini. Still it seems to satisfy the angry Mancini must not be questioned brigade. I'd love to reply to him but in the interests of not wanting to incur the wrath of the moral majority and not be "provocative" I have to leave it.
Come on, as rants go, it is very good.

And this bit "- but the argument itself hasn't changed even if the parameters have i.e. 'we will never win a big game with Mancini' to 'we will never win a trophy with Mancini' followed by 'we will never win the league with Mancini' and finally the last roll of the dice 'we will never win the CL with Mancini'..." certainly rings true.

I don't think he or anyone says questions Mancini is not allowed, he is joking poking fun at the lousy divination skills of some on here and the ITK innuendo that Mancini is gone.
 
As I say replying in kind would probably see me serving yet another ban for being provocative. So we'll have to leave it there. But if Kowalski is really bored with the Mancini discussion he should probably finding coping mechanisms as nothing's changed.
 
BillyShears said:
as nothing's changed.
Aside from Mancini answering each and every criticism of what he wouldn't be able to do (big games, trophy, Prem) with just one outstanding.
 
To me Pep has not been proven when you have Iniesta, Xavi, Pique, Messi your team kinda selects itself. Mancini to me is the real deal taking risks (Balo v QPR) etc and winning things that way even under pressure working unpaid at Florentina. What other manager would stick by a club when the fans are sending him death threats? Then at Lazio he won things even though the club was dead broke lets see Pep do that then I will rate him.
 
A proper applied transfer window this summer over-seen by Txiki, Squad trimmed of the dead wood once and for all with talented players bought for specific areas

Bobby will be guiding us to the treble next year
 
And then there's this fucking cock slapper: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/premier-league/2013/01/17/3678237/chelsea-manchester-city-paid-for-lack-of-history-in-race-for" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/pre ... n-race-for</a>

Chelsea & Manchester City paid for lack of history in race for Guardiola, hints Rio Ferdinand
The highly sought-after 42-year-old manager will take over the reins of the German giants at the end of the season now, replacing the retiring Jupp Heynckes at the helm.

A short-term approach and lack of history saw Premier League giants Chelsea and Manchester City miss out on the services of Pep Guardiola, according to Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand.

The former Barcelona coach - who won 16 pieces of silverware during a trophy-laden four-year stint at the Catalan club - announced his long-awaited comeback on Wednesday, with Bayern Munich clinching the much-lauded manager’s signature despite heavy interest from England.

Guardiola is set to sign a three-year deal until 2016, replacing the retiring Jupp Heynckes in the process, in a move that Ferdinand was both surprised yet supportive of.

Ferdinand posted on Twitter: "The news yesterday of Pep going to Bayern Munich was a shock...until you step back and think why...stability, organised, competitive in CL.

"Money to invest, history+time I'm assuming to put his stamp on the club... he obviously wasn't guaranteed all that at other clubs linked to!"
 
Rocket Sauce said:
And then there's this fucking cock slapper: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/premier-league/2013/01/17/3678237/chelsea-manchester-city-paid-for-lack-of-history-in-race-for" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/pre ... n-race-for</a>

Chelsea & Manchester City paid for lack of history in race for Guardiola, hints Rio Ferdinand
The highly sought-after 42-year-old manager will take over the reins of the German giants at the end of the season now, replacing the retiring Jupp Heynckes at the helm.

A short-term approach and lack of history saw Premier League giants Chelsea and Manchester City miss out on the services of Pep Guardiola, according to Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand.

The former Barcelona coach - who won 16 pieces of silverware during a trophy-laden four-year stint at the Catalan club - announced his long-awaited comeback on Wednesday, with Bayern Munich clinching the much-lauded manager’s signature despite heavy interest from England.

Guardiola is set to sign a three-year deal until 2016, replacing the retiring Jupp Heynckes in the process, in a move that Ferdinand was both surprised yet supportive of.

Ferdinand posted on Twitter: "The news yesterday of Pep going to Bayern Munich was a shock...until you step back and think why...stability, organised, competitive in CL.

"Money to invest, history+time I'm assuming to put his stamp on the club... he obviously wasn't guaranteed all that at other clubs linked to!"
He is a cock but hints at no such thing.

Nothing he says there that is incorrect.
 
Rocket Sauce said:
And then there's this fucking cock slapper: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/premier-league/2013/01/17/3678237/chelsea-manchester-city-paid-for-lack-of-history-in-race-for" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/pre ... n-race-for</a>

Chelsea & Manchester City paid for lack of history in race for Guardiola, hints Rio Ferdinand
The highly sought-after 42-year-old manager will take over the reins of the German giants at the end of the season now, replacing the retiring Jupp Heynckes at the helm.

A short-term approach and lack of history saw Premier League giants Chelsea and Manchester City miss out on the services of Pep Guardiola, according to Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand.

The former Barcelona coach - who won 16 pieces of silverware during a trophy-laden four-year stint at the Catalan club - announced his long-awaited comeback on Wednesday, with Bayern Munich clinching the much-lauded manager’s signature despite heavy interest from England.

Guardiola is set to sign a three-year deal until 2016, replacing the retiring Jupp Heynckes in the process, in a move that Ferdinand was both surprised yet supportive of.

Ferdinand posted on Twitter: "The news yesterday of Pep going to Bayern Munich was a shock...until you step back and think why...stability, organised, competitive in CL.

"Money to invest, history+time I'm assuming to put his stamp on the club... he obviously wasn't guaranteed all that at other clubs linked to!"

Any guess on Rio's IQ?

Looks like he's taking a shot at his own club with 'money to invest'
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.