I was asked a question and I gave an answer. The referendum wasn't binding. THIS is all down to the antics of the Tories, who I didn't vote for.
Ah a remainer telling leavers what their opinions should be, never seen that before.
Interesting "like" from someone who previously denounced twitter users and their opinions though ;)
Ah a remainer telling leavers what their opinions should be, never seen that before.
Interesting "like" from someone who previously denounced twitter users and their opinions though ;)
Pound rallied on news of no-deal getting off the table.
https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/g...creasing-chances-of-a-hard-brexi-201909051913
Simply the market showing what it values more with its wallet.
But again, the point was about Thornberry and how it made no sense for her to suggest people should support a Labour Govt. to negotiate a deal that she be involved in, and would then not support or promote.Nowhere in that tweet was a remainer telling a leaver what their opinion should be.
That was a sensible person explaining succinctly how it's possible for Labour to carry out their duty to the electorate by negotiating a deal, while believing as a party that remain is better.
Pound rallied on news of no-deal getting off the table.
https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/g...creasing-chances-of-a-hard-brexi-201909051913
Simply the market showing what it values more with its wallet.
It would rally if Reece Mogg & Raab ate Boris Johnson, thus getting rid of all.
But again, the point was about Thornberry and how it made no sense for her to suggest people should support a Labour Govt. to negotiate a deal that she be involved in, and would then not support or promote.
Predicted loss of growth on 5.5% of GDP as opposed to 8%. Brilliant news. Might as well 'just get on with it' then.This hyper-fetishism of market prices is what caused the Brexit vote to win in the first place.
And for the record, at the same time the Bank of England chief declared that the predicted loss of growth for a no deal Brexit had been overstated and then reevaluted their figure.
You, as with everybody who talks about "how the markets react" pick and choose what things influence and what don't.
And for the record, at the same time the Bank of England chief declared that the predicted loss of growth for a no deal Brexit had been overstated and then reevaluted their figure.
You, as with everybody who talks about "how the markets react" pick and choose what things influence and what don't.
He would only need a simple majority for the anticipated one clause Election Bill setting aside the FTPA, which will follow the current scheduled motion should it fail, which as you say the Opposition coalition have withdrawn their support from and consequently won't reach the threshold. The 21 Tory rebels, having seen their Extension pass into law, are obliged to give their party its best chance to beat Corbyn on October 15th and give the country the final option to decide if No Deal stays on the table. As Tories they can't claim they don't believe Boris won't change the election date to November to enable a crash out. It offers an opportnity for them to return to the fold accepting an olive branch from Boris, as he just hinted this morning. None of them wants to be damaged by a Brexit Party association post October 31st. I don't know if this sequence has already been gamed out by Cummings but it's possible, even likely.Even with the 21 rebels he doesn't have a majority.
I understand it perfectyl, but given Thornberry's tone and her canvassing to get leave votes by "trusting them", to hear her say "yeah, I still wouldn't back the deal, even if it was my own", is a ludicrous one to suggest if she wants people's support, hence the groans.You're being wilfully stupid now.
Emily Thornberry would negotiate a deal to leave because the public voted to leave and a labour government would be duty bound to do so because of the referendum result.
That's got nothing to do with their position on leave/remain in a second referendum, it's to do with their position on deal/no deal.
This is not a difficult concept to understand.
I understand it perfectyl, but given Thornberry's tone and her canvassing to get leave votes by "trusting them", to hear her say "yeah, I still wouldn't back the deal, even if it was my own", is a ludicrous one to suggest if she wants people's support, hence the groans.
He would only need a simple majority for the anticipated one clause Election Bill setting aside the FTPA, which will follow the current scheduled motion should it fail, which as you say the Opposition coalition have withdrawn their support from and consequently won't reach the threshold. The 21 Tory rebels, having seen their Extension pass into law, are obliged to give their party its best chance to beat Corbyn on October 15th and give the country the final option to decide if No Deal stays on the table. As Tories they can't claim they don't believe Boris won't change the election date to November to enable a crash out. It offers an opportnity for them to return to the fold accepting an olive branch from Boris, as he just hinted this morning. None of them wants to be damaged by a Brexit Party association post October 31st. I don't know if this sequence has already been gamed out by Cummings but it's possible, even likely.
Their party?He would only need a simple majority for the anticipated one clause Election Bill setting aside the FTPA, which will follow the current scheduled motion should it fail, which as you say the Opposition coalition have withdrawn their support from and consequently won't reach the threshold. The 21 Tory rebels, having seen their Extension pass into law, are obliged to give their party its best chance to beat Corbyn on October 15th and give the country the final option to decide if No Deal stays on the table. As Tories they can't claim they don't believe Boris won't change the election date to November to enable a crash out. It offers an opportnity for them to return to the fold accepting an olive branch from Boris, as he just hinted this morning. None of them wants to be damaged by a Brexit Party association post October 31st. I don't know if this sequence has already been gamed out by Cummings but it's possible, even likely.
Predicted loss of growth on 5.5% of GDP as opposed to 8%. Brilliant news. Might as well 'just get on with it' then.
Hopefully McDonnell will ever have the opportunity to let me say "I fucking told you so".Now you're making stuff up.
The difficult concept to understand is why the EU would bother meeting her on that basis. Waste. Of. Time.You're being wilfully stupid now.
Emily Thornberry would negotiate a deal to leave because the public voted to leave and a labour government would be duty bound to do so because of the referendum result.
That's got nothing to do with their position on leave/remain in a second referendum, it's to do with their position on deal/no deal.
This is not a difficult concept to understand.
Johnson seems to ha e one promising more money her there and everywhereHopefully McDonnell will ever have the opportunity to let me say "I fucking told you so".
Where exactly do you think he plans on getting the money from for the "sweeping nationalisation policy" - as the Guardian called it?
The money tree? Or by taking it off people. Hint: there is no money tree.