I don't even see that. We'll just end up remaining in by a "vote" of Parliament that the public neither authorised nor endorsed. Similar to how we ended up in the thing, tbh.
But May's ability to impose her red lines at all were a consequence of the chronically flawed and inadequate mechanism to leave.
Which everyone has now rejected including rejecting the person themselves who came up with it.
He's the one demanding unilateral changes while failing to offer a viable alternative, he and his cabinet are the ones that have created the issues from day 1 with undeliverable promises and unworkable demands.
No, the Brexit party didn't exist.
Unworkable here having the meaning of the EU unwiling to be flexible.
Which would require a lengthy extension and a show of willingness from Johnson and his cabinet to move away from May's red lines and compromise on their own demands. They've ruled out the first and shown zero inclination to do any of the rest.
Why, if the EU "aren't going to renegotiate", as remainers claim?
The EU have to operate within the context of international trade law, the UK are still pretending that they're exempt from it.
And what willingness have the EU shown to respect the laws and rules of the UK union, say the GFA?
The EU rarely follows international trade laws.
The EU are a signatory of the GFA already and have offered NI special status which is a huge concession. The DUP said no and the Tories turned it down
An ultra soft Brexit (and discernibly softer than May's deal) is the only way to avoid the scenario of national disunity that we both fear. The problem, as you point out, is that too few people on each side are prepared to compromise.
Pray offer an example?
I lol’d. BZBest I could do.
Then why offer NI a "special status" if it accepts the terms of the GFA? Why be deliberately antagonistic?
I suspect the EU will view it differently from you. May's deal was also owned and crafted by them.