Do you mean Goebbels?Johnson is about to go full Goring on us.
If the Supreme Court issue an order for Parliament to reconvened the consequences will be catastrophic for Boris. Interesting refutation on Sky just now of Sumption's argument about the separation of the political and the legal when this prorogation has been shown as clearly intended to prevent parliament from exercising their due political deliberations.Agreed. But the Supremes may decide that a century old precedent on the absolutism of Parliament needs updating when you have an occupant of No. 10 who seeks to put himself above the rule of law and Parliament.
All to play for.
Leadsom on the government's not publishing Yellowhammer:
I actually do not think that it serves people well to see what is the absolutely worst thing that could happen. The worst thing that could happen to me is I could walk out of here and get run over. It is not a prediction, but it is something that could happen. And simply putting out there all of the possible permutations of what could happen actually just serves to concern people.
And if she starts crossing the road and realises that rather than a quiet road in a built up area, it's actually a busy motorway, she'll carry on trying to cross the road, rather than turn back, take stock, and maybe find a bridge to cross it instead.And presumably by knowing this, she will take the utmost caution when crossing the road.
JC likes this.Wait till they find out they have to give 20% of their shares to the workers and pay them a yearly dividend.
It's the correct ruling. If parliament are to be sovereign (given that sovereignty can only be absolute) it should be illegal to suspend parliament without it's consent.
If anyone has the power to do so, then they're sovereign instead of parliament.
I know that was a common misconception when "no deal" was first mentioned but assumed no one was still that ill-informed.That's putting it mildly. We've never seen anything like this though, it's incredible. (quick side note, just been outside having a cig, chatting to a guy from our IT dept. Had to explain to him that no deal doesn't mean remain. Gobsmacked doesn't come close)
You think Labour and the LibDems will be cancelling their conferences?Get backed to Parliament you bunch of disingenuous self serving k@NTS.
Get backed to Parliament you bunch of disingenuous self serving k@NTS.
Reasons for Boris to be cheerful - Engish and Scottish Constitutional law are apparently very different due to the 'poisonous' influence of A C Dicicey on the former. This may result in the Gov appeal being upheld.
Another nail in the Union's coffin. The referendum has unleashed forces that cannot be contained.If that's true, the Supreme Court could rule it lawful in England and unlawful in Scotland.
Not much different to the queen being CofE in England and Presbyterian in Scotland.
If it's unlawful in one part of the realm that should make it unlawful in all parts.
Agreed. But the Supremes may decide that a century old precedent on the absolutism of Parliament needs updating when you have an occupant of No. 10 who seeks to put himself above the rule of law and Parliament.
All to play for.
In Labour's case it would mean cancelling their Manifesto, which would be a huge relief for their leadership. The effort those Comrades have to put into concealing their plans for the systemic abolition of capitalism is wearing them down.You think Labour and the LibDems will be cancelling their conferences?
You think Labour and the LibDems will be cancelling their conferences?
I see what you mean. Attack on parliament, Reichstag fire etc.*Goering
Bleeding phone again
Daily random bollocks from George.![]()
Daily Didsbury disinformation
Not Arsed 99% of Mp’s are in it for 2 things to be noticed and to fill there Bank accounts as quickly as possible! Like I say they are a bunch of disingenuous Self serving K@NTS.