Good grief. This morning you were worried about Britain compromising, now any sign of both sides comprising and you're back to an EU climbdown (so long as the elected PM leaves it to unelected officials).Interesting stuff, for completeness though - given that the article that you have quoted as comments such as:
"Both sides know they're going to have to move towards each other, but who goes first? To this end Barnier and EU trade chief Phil Hogan issued come get me pleas to UK last week with the clear message 'we'll compromise if you do'.
and:
".....Much of the public row on LPF has focussed on EU's out there state aid demands which have always looked untenable. EU climbdown on that could create space for UK to up its offer."
It might have been appropriate for you to note something along the lines of:
"We will not see movement from the EU unless and until they are faced with the prospect of a viable walk-away option – and the political will to use it”
This was always true - and has been proven to be months ago. But I am pleased to see, as you are quoting this article, that you are now also gaining an understaning.
Who is running this country? Swapping the Brussels bureaucrats for our own shadier versions. And you know the Brussels bureaucrats are better because according to Leavers they always stitched us up (presumably including the Brits working for the EU).
Seriously, do you know what Frost's brief is? Is he really expecting unicorns? Is it a Cummings-drafted crash and burn policy? Or is he perhaps "following the economics" (on fish, farming, finance and factories)?
In case I haven't got your attention yet on the nitty-gritty of our predicament, can you tell us anything about fish, farming, finance and factories?