Essembe said:
SWP's back said:
And thank fuck we didn't have guns. We had looting, a few shops burnt. The shops were insured and many went to prison. What we didn't have was gun warfare on the streets and tens if not hundreds killed in gun battles.
Like you never have riots in the states.
You have 30,000 per year killed by guns, that is the old capacity of Maine Road, killed by guns. We have 100. Your population is 5 times ours, not 300 times.
Only a fucking idiot would still try and argue that guns make your country safer.
Oh my, another aggressive personal attack.
You asked and I quote
Only a fucking idiot would still try and argue that guns make your country safer.
My answer is Switzerland. No one invades that country as they know every adult has a gun.
-- Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:51 pm --
SWP's back said:
I wouldn't even enter into dialogue with someone capable of such fucking appalling debate and reasoning mate.
Fucking right wing NRA apologist nut job.
These personal characterisations are becoming quite agressive. Perhaps you could refrain from these please.
Tell you what mate, when my "aggressive personal attacks" kill 30 people including 20 kids then you can start complain.
As long as you make moronic apologies for your gun toting pals then I shall treat you with the disdain I see fit.
As for Switzerland, no one invades them as were the aggressors personal bloody banker. You really think the Nazi's (having wiped out most of Europe and just kicked a fucking huge hole in Russia - a country with more guns than the Germans had people) took a look at Switzerland and said "fuck this for a game of dominoes, these fuckers each have a 9mm hand gun"?
And you ignored the rest re 30,000 die vs 100.
Explain how you are safer having seen the stats? And by 'safer' I don't mean "holding a gun makes up for my own inadequacies and I can play the big man like John Wayne - pow pow"