'arry admits it

[BlueCityfan]

Because of the Cl football you will have this season larger income. But it's just 1 year man. We dont even need the revenue.

Your owner bought Spurs to get more money. Our owner have much bigger plans for the future. You can read the 500+ paged "las vegas" thread to see.

So who cares if you get 1 year bigger income? it's the long run that matters.

If you fail to get to Cl this season. Your income will be much less again.

I think you will find that upon announcing the financial results for that period that City will have added well over £40m in revenue via prize/tv/place monies as well as more commercial revenue.

The fact that Spurs fans (and fans of every other club) dont see it is a fault of the media who never talk about the real MCFC.

They will however learn very quickly what the real situation is.

So even without CL football our revenue can be higher than Spuds? Eat that Spuds fan.

The future is blue!

 

[taconinja]

So even without CL football our revenue can be higher than Spuds? Eat that Spuds fan.

The future is blue!

Barca's new shirt sponsor deal opened up a big door as to what's possible for us. One of the big sticking points has been the "reasonable" term in the FFPR, which would prevent a club from having a bajillion pound sponsorship as it would be funny if City were out of line with the competition's deals. Now that Barca has this huge deal, it opens up the reasonableness argument for us as well to have a crazy sponsor deal.

 

[THFC6061]

I think you will find that upon announcing the financial results for that period that City will have added well over £40m in revenue via prize/tv/place monies as well as more commercial revenue.

The fact that Spurs fans (and fans of every other club) dont see it is a fault of the media who never talk about the real MCFC.

They will however learn very quickly what the real situation is.

So even without CL football our revenue can be higher than Spuds? Eat that Spuds fan.

The future is blue!

Well any fool can generate a huge turnover by selling £20 notes for a fiver.

But he won't make any profit by doing so, nor will he be in business too long either.

This is why the turnover figures are pretty well meaningless by themselves.

The important question is how profitable is City compared to Spurs?

 

[taconinja]

You have a lot of gall attempting to paint City's ownership as swindlers. He isn't up on tax evasion is he? Nor is he the person who ruined multiple football clubs, is he?

 

[SWP's back]

Re: Redknaap talks shit

I agree with him. We have some real tough games coming up, and I hope to God we're not sitting here in a couple of months time saying 'those draws at home have cost us a CL place'.

Unfortunately 'those draws at home' HAVE cost us a CL place.

ermmm no.

 

[THFC6061]

You have a lot of gall attempting to paint City's ownership as swindlers. He isn't up on tax evasion is he? Nor is he the person who ruined multiple football clubs, is he?

Que?

Where have I ever done such a thing?

And the ones who "ruined multiple football clubs" are their respective Chairmen, Chielf Financial Officers and Boards of Directors.

 

[Bulldoglikeapproach]

You have a lot of gall attempting to paint City's ownership as swindlers. He isn't up on tax evasion is he? Nor is he the person who ruined multiple football clubs, is he?

Que?

Where have I ever done such a thing?

And the ones who "ruined multiple football clubs" are their respective Chairmen, Chielf Financial Officers and Boards of Directors.

True, but what is the common thread with all of these clubs? 'Arry.

 

[Manc in London]

Well any fool can generate a huge turnover by selling £20 notes for a fiver.

But he won't make any profit by doing so, nor will he be in business too long either.

This is why the turnover figures are pretty well meaningless by themselves.

The important question is how profitable is City compared to Spurs?

Turnover figures are meaningless? Don't be silly. Our turnover has grown significantly in two years. To say that is meaningless, is quite frankly stupid.

In relation to your post about sugar daddies (a term drenched in bitterness): In the last two rights issues at Spurs, who bought the additional shares?

Spurs supporters talk about profit as a badge of honour. Meanwhile Spurs fans bend over and take it dry, paying incredibly high ticket prices. Are you proud of your club's ticket pricing policy? Does it make you feel warm inside? Do you think the prices are affordable for those who live in Tottenham?

 

[Bluemoon115]

So even without CL football our revenue can be higher than Spuds? Eat that Spuds fan.

The future is blue!

Well any fool can generate a huge turnover by selling £20 notes for a fiver.

But he won't make any profit by doing so, nor will he be in business too long either.

This is why the turnover figures are pretty well meaningless by themselves.

The important question is how profitable is City compared to Spurs?

Not very. However, the profit and loss of millions is only truly relevant if you don't have £150 billion to play with, otherwise it just needs to match up on paper.

Come back in 5 years and ask that question though, you're in for a surprise...

 

[mancboy123]

You blame the chairmen, owners, etc of each club for putting the club into the administration who is the one common denominator in all those clubs?