Arsenal and Liverpool threat???

Re:

lee-mcfc said:
Yes ofcourse they are a threat! i wouldnt write off any team as we'v only played one game... we wernt exactly great yday dont forget.


Thought our passing was better than them though(arse and dippers that is)
 
Spurs look better than either of them tbh. But it's only 1 game even though I can't see that Liverpool have, or can improve, and Arsenal look weaker. They are heavily reliant on a couple of players each.

We'll know more by next Monday night.
 
anyone just hear what redknapper jnr just said, if shay given wants to go to arsenal, then city can do nothing about it, prick?
 
Re: Re:

samharris said:
lee-mcfc said:
Yes ofcourse they are a threat! i wouldnt write off any team as we'v only played one game... we wernt exactly great yday dont forget.


Thought our passing was better than them though(arse and dippers that is)
Oh come on, Spurs were completely burnt out second half and thats why you had so much time on the ball, even then the tempo was very slow. Arsenal passed it realy well today but they flatter to diceive against any decent team.
 
Re: Re:

samharris said:
lee-mcfc said:
Yes ofcourse they are a threat! i wouldnt write off any team as we'v only played one game... we wernt exactly great yday dont forget.


Thought our passing was better than them though(arse and dippers that is)
Disagree arsenal passing game was top notch ..thats all they didd pass the ball............. just think this thread is stupid if am being honest
 
oakiecokie said:
Both teams and supporters were probably saying the same about us,this time yesterday !!

I agree, i dont see at this point in the season anyone been able to predict anything. I am sure we will bed down well, proof of that was in the second half against spuds, however Liverpool had to play half a match with 10 men and tbh i dont think they did that bad at all for a club with a new manager.
 
Re: Re:

Mastes1 said:
samharris said:
Thought our passing was better than them though(arse and dippers that is)
Oh come on, Spurs were completely burnt out second half and thats why you had so much time on the ball, even then the tempo was very slow. Arsenal passed it realy well today but they flatter to diceive against any decent team.

And theres me thinking a game went on for 90 mins.. my bad... <a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/chalkboards/create" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/chalkboards/create</a>
 
Re: Re:

samharris said:
Mastes1 said:
Oh come on, Spurs were completely burnt out second half and thats why you had so much time on the ball, even then the tempo was very slow. Arsenal passed it realy well today but they flatter to diceive against any decent team.

And theres me thinking a game went on for 90 mins.. my bad... <a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/chalkboards/create" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/chalkboards/create</a>
You sound like a stat man, someone who sees their team get 55% possesion meaning they must of been the better team, football doesn't work like that.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.