Fair opinion. It would have been dumb for Arsenal to go all out attack against us with an advantage.'Park the bus wankers' who scored 91 goals in the PL last season.
I'm not sure why you think Arsenal should have given up their main strategic advantage against City (the defence, and Haaland being Saliba's little bunny in particular) and instead play into City's hands.
I'd have liked for us to have gone for it and tried to win but it wasn't happening that day, we couldn't get through the City lines. Going more attacking would have played into City's hands. Anyone can see this surely
In the rest of our games we scored a bunch of goals and had the same goal difference as City. We won against all the top 3 teams. We just shat the bed at home to Villa. It happens.
P.S. are Real Madrid 'park the bus wankers' as well? They adopted similar tactics at the Etihad because decent teams figure out where they can capitalise on weaknesses of opponents and adapt their game accordingly.
I don't understand why our fans always vhope opponents play an open game against us. Granted, on a day when we are off, you might get lucky and beat us by playing open football. Like West Ham did last year. But on any average day, an open game against Man City is historically a losing strategy.
PSG plays us open almost every time. And they get smacked for it often. Even on days we are off we still beat them coz it's just stupid to play a superior possession team openly.
Talk less when you have an advantage in the standing and not losing keeps you ahead.