Arsenal Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe that all football matches should have a defined time for the ball in play, say 60 minutes. The clock stops for out of play, injuries, substitutions and free kicks. This season time wasting has become an epidemic. Bournemouth yesterday like Everton before took ages over goal kicks, feigning head injuries especially when we were on the attack and taking ages over substitutions. Frankly, the ref yesterday could have easily added more than 6 minutes and even at the start of injury time another of their players went down ‘injured’, so the ref was right to add that time to the 6 minutes. I thought the time added on in the World Cup was refreshing and if it helps to stamp out time wasting, all the better.

Why 60 minutes ? As paying customers and rules of football the match is 90 minutes long.
At 60 minutes fans are still done out of 30 minutes football !
 
Remind me…did you not win 4 titles in 5 years? I’m not sure why you think you’re hard done by…
We're entitled these days you know...
If we win it, then it'll be because your lot have slipped up as I don't see City doing the same.
That said, both teams could have slip ups and the rags nip in and steal it, and THAT would nevet do...
 
I don’t mind them adding all of that time for the wasting done. My problem is the inconsistency in applying it.

In the same breath, do we get that added time for time wasting? Would a lower-end team losing 1-0 against United or Liverpool, for example?

Time wasting has almost become a personal choice for referees to enforce - whether it’s booking City players in the 30th minute, or letting Prickford get away with it for a full 90 minutes. It’s madness how a flagship league is refereed to such a wank standard.

I agree with that hence why I suggested in my post a few minutes ago that there should be a fixed time for when the ball is in play so avoiding the arbitrary nature of the amount of time currently added on.
 
We’re not favourites with most bookies, tbf.
What worries me is that they have an easier looking run of fixtures than us before it flips and they have the harder looking games. I think we need to at least match them points wise until the game at ours. If we then go on and win that then we’ll be within a couple of points of them.

Well I’m saying that but I’ve no idea if the rearranged West Ham game will be played before our game against Arsenal. And we’ll have another rearranged game at Brighton if we get to the FA Cup semi so that might not be the case after all.
 
So you expect the wheels to fall off even with the help you are getting... I'll believe you

No, I have no expectation. Obviously, I’m hoping we can win the title but know also it will be difficult up against a team with City’s pedigree. I’m just taking each game at a time. Fulham away up next is a tricky tie. One loss could change things quite quickly.
 
I agree with that hence why I suggested in my post a few minutes ago that there should be a fixed time for when the ball is in play so avoiding the arbitrary nature of the amount of time currently added on.
One thing I agree on... They should play to a timed hooter like I'm sure they do in one code of rugby

Then there's zero point time wasting AND it can't be manipulated
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.