Austerity My A***

[nmc]

The Royal Family have significant other sources of income - so not sure why the tax payer has to pay for one of the most overbloated and expensive institutions on the planet. If we want a monarch that’s fine but they really need to reign it in a bit - pardon the pun - they seem to show limited understanding of the poverty elsewhere in society.

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Just sell some houses, charge your lizard off-spring and hangers on rent or flog some jewellery.

 

[remember arthur mann]

The Royal Family have significant other sources of income - so not sure why the tax payer has to pay for one of the most overbloated and expensive institutions on the planet. If we want a monarch that’s fine but they really need to reign it in a bit - pardon the pun - they seem to show limited understanding of the poverty elsewhere in society.

 

[kaz7]

The Royal Family have significant other sources of income - so not sure why the tax payer has to pay for one of the most overbloated and expensive institutions on the planet. If we want a monarch that’s fine but they really need to reign it in a bit - pardon the pun - they seem to show limited understanding of the poverty elsewhere in society.

Which is why they do so much charity work?

 

[Bill Walker]

The Royal Family have significant other sources of income - so not sure why the tax payer has to pay for one of the most overbloated and expensive institutions on the planet. If we want a monarch that’s fine but they really need to reign it in a bit - pardon the pun - they seem to show limited understanding of the poverty elsewhere in society.

Well you cant blame Meghan, she only wore 41 designer label outfits on here recent tour of Oz. So proof that she's cutting back.

She's been through an incredible 41 outfit changes since touching down in Sydney on 15th October, so it's no wonder the final tally for the Duchess of Sussex's royal tour wardrobe is rather eye-watering.

"In the past 16 days, Meghan has worn clothing to the value of almost £118,000, including designer labels such as Givenchy, Jason Wu and Brandon Maxwell.

It's a particularly eye-watering total given that the Duchess of Cambridge wore new clothing valued at £117,000 throughout the course of 2017.

In fact, the only remotely thrifty piece Meghan sported during the tour was a £35 ASOS maternity dress - teamed with a £432 coat and £1,700 earrings."

 

[kaz7]

Well you cant blame Meghan, she only wore 41 designer label outfits on here recent tour of Oz. So proof that she's cutting back.

She's been through an incredible 41 outfit changes since touching down in Sydney on 15th October, so it's no wonder the final tally for the Duchess of Sussex's royal tour wardrobe is rather eye-watering.

"In the past 16 days, Meghan has worn clothing to the value of almost £118,000, including designer labels such as Givenchy, Jason Wu and Brandon Maxwell.

It's a particularly eye-watering total given that the Duchess of Cambridge wore new clothing valued at £117,000 throughout the course of 2017.

In fact, the only remotely thrifty piece Meghan sported during the tour was a £35 ASOS maternity dress - teamed with a £432 coat and £1,700 earrings."

How do you know she didn't bring some of those with her from her past life,she was stylish before harry and has a personal wealth of 5 million,all we know is one of them still had a label on it

 

[Djibrilshairdo]

Don’t forget she had to buy Phil the Greek some new hips. He worn out the originals year ago due to all that thrusting in his middle age.

 

[Bill Walker]

How do you know she didn't bring some of those with her from her past life,she was stylish before harry and has a personal wealth of 5 million,all we know is one of them still had a label on it

Her bump wouldnt let her wear her old clothes surely ?

 

[Bill]

the queen is worth her weight in gold to this country. I for one am very proud of our royal family.

 

[Bill]

And Meghan is stunning. Born to be a princess.