ForeverCity
Well-Known Member
i think it's good,
bolton wasn't that good to be honest but mostly all grounds we outsing the home team.
bolton wasn't that good to be honest but mostly all grounds we outsing the home team.
cheddar404 said:It was better when we were shitter. Ironic.
We weren't inrecession five years ago remember a good Wed night following at Arsenal when Pearce was in charge too.lancs blue said:spacecadet said:Numbers are less than in the 80-90s due to cost and the pain in the arse of buying tickets.
We took more away when Pearce was in charge 5 years ago than we do now.
mcfcliam said:Shite.
ban-mcfc said:mcfcliam said:Shite.
every time i see you post it's normally negative.
what's up man?
WNRH said:In terms of numbers
1. Rags
2. Liverpool
3. Sunderland
4. Everton
5. Newcastle
6. Sunderland
7. Chelsea
8. Spurs
9. City
In terms of atmosphere.
1. Rags
2. City
3. The rest
marios stress ball said:WNRH said:In terms of numbers
1. Rags
2. Liverpool
3. Sunderland
4. Everton
5. Newcastle
6. Sunderland
7. Chelsea
8. Spurs
9. City
In terms of atmosphere.
1. Rags
2. City
3. The rest
I don't see 1/3 of the match singing about another team is a good atmosphere, West Brom away the 1st 15 mins were dedicated to city, then Rooney, then City again!
WNRH said:marios stress ball said:WNRH said:In terms of numbers
1. Rags
2. Liverpool
3. Sunderland
4. Everton
5. Newcastle
6. Sunderland
7. Chelsea
8. Spurs
9. City
In terms of atmosphere.
1. Rags
2. City
3. The rest
I don't see 1/3 of the match singing about another team is a good atmosphere, West Brom away the 1st 15 mins were dedicated to city, then Rooney, then City again!
For home atmosphere i reckon were 17th or 18th in the league.