You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bale to consider future
- Thread starter SuperYaya
- Start date
Uwe Rosler's Grandad
Well-Known Member
I think Gareth Bale is a better fit than Hazard. He is proven at this level and performed well in the Champions League. There will be no cultural differences or homesickness. He is still only 22 (only one year older than Hazard). Can play anywhere down the left flank. Last season's league stats are 10 goals and 13 assists are a good return. He can also take a mean free kick.
I doubt he would cost more than Hazard and would probably be about 100k a week cheaper wage and his wages shouldn't rock the boat either City FFP wise or upsetting players.
I doubt he would cost more than Hazard and would probably be about 100k a week cheaper wage and his wages shouldn't rock the boat either City FFP wise or upsetting players.
Bale would cost more than Hazard.Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:I doubt he would cost more than Hazard and would probably be about 100k a week cheaper wage and his wages shouldn't rock the boat either City FFP wise or upsetting players.
Not only to purchase, but wages as well.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
20-25 plus adebayor spuds and we've got a deal.
Uwe Rosler's Grandad
Well-Known Member
Jumanji said:Bale would cost more than Hazard.Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:I doubt he would cost more than Hazard and would probably be about 100k a week cheaper wage and his wages shouldn't rock the boat either City FFP wise or upsetting players.
Not only to purchase, but wages as well.
What makes you say that?
Apparently, Hazard could cost about £35m in transfer fees, another £4-5m in agent's fees and about 200k a week wages. That makes it a total cost over 5 years of about £91-92m. As for Bale, I'd say about the same in transfer fees and agent's fees and probably about £120k a week wages. Over 5 years a total cost of about £70-71m. Apparently Bale is currently on 70k a week and Spurs have quoted £36m to Barcelona if they want him. I also doubt his agent would be after as much as Hazards.
Paulmcfc2703
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 8,933
Bale is on 35k at Spurs if he was on 100k with us he would be on a lot less than Hazard.Jumanji said:Bale would cost more than Hazard.Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:I doubt he would cost more than Hazard and would probably be about 100k a week cheaper wage and his wages shouldn't rock the boat either City FFP wise or upsetting players.
Not only to purchase, but wages as well.
Uwe Rosler's Grandad said:I think Gareth Bale is a better fit than Hazard. He is proven at this level and performed well in the Champions League. There will be no cultural differences or homesickness. He is still only 22 (only one year older than Hazard). Can play anywhere down the left flank. Last season's league stats are 10 goals and 13 assists are a good return. He can also take a mean free kick.
I doubt he would cost more than Hazard and would probably be about 100k a week cheaper wage and his wages shouldn't rock the boat either City FFP wise or upsetting players.
Broadly agree with this. I really like Bale and would love to see him at City. Top player imo.
cleav
Well-Known Member
just saw something that said spurs are offering bale 70k/week to stay
we could easily give him 100k/week and offer him CL football...why wouldn't he jump at that?
even if we only matched their offer, we should have the advantage...and 70k/week for bale is good value compared to many other contracts out there.
we could easily give him 100k/week and offer him CL football...why wouldn't he jump at that?
even if we only matched their offer, we should have the advantage...and 70k/week for bale is good value compared to many other contracts out there.