I didn’t read them.
How about you respond to my post rather than insulting me ?
Let’s take the algorithm point again let’s say club x is looking for a defensive midfielder and it wants to focus on tackling ability Mean while club y needs a defensive midfielder more like Rodri it will focus on say passing ability.
How will the algorithm work ? It won’t you will pick the players with the best stats in the main areas that your particular club is looking at for a particular type of player.
I wouldn’t call that an algorithm
Scouts will also judge a player on less stat like stuff for example Robinho was possibly one of the most talented players I have seen a lot of his talent wouldn’t show on stats. Was it Mouriniho who said odgard touched the ball differently it made a different sound when he had the ball ? It’s up to clubs to decide how to value that.
Let’s go back to the data point CFG probably have more data than most for the reasons I explained
I apologise if you felt insulted. All the answers are in the articles. If you are interested I don’t know why you wouldn’t read them.
To briefly answer your questions though…
The algorithm does, in its most basic aspect, what you are saying it can’t do. In fact nearly all sports science can do this, it’s nothing special in that regard. Statsbomb are probably the best known but Jamestown Analytics is in another league entirely.
You asked what the algorithm was. Given that only Bloom knows and it’s worth hundreds of millions to him and relies on nobody else knowing I thought you might be joking. He made his money by beating the bookmakers in the Asian markets. He does this with data that gives him an edge over anyone else. If his algorithms were known his edge would be lost.
Scouting is still important, you are right there. Data is good in that it can narrow the field based on required criteria and budget but it can’t tell you if the player will disturb the dressing room for example.
Ok so City. We have one of the biggest analytical departments in World football currently led by Laurie Shaw who you can read about here….
A PhD in computational astrophysics, developing trading systems for a £30bn hedge fund and policy advisor for the British government: not your typical CV for a member of backroom staff. However, these are just some of the credentials of Laurie Shaw, who has been appointed Lead AI Scientist by...
archive.trainingground.guru
It is also correct that the data we share in the CFG gives us a significant edge over most clubs that don’t have the multi team model. However, it’s how the data is used that is most important as any data analyst would tell you.
Like most things in life there are levels. I don’t mean to insult you but Football Manager would be the equivalent of say Grimsby and that’s not to say it’s useless, it’s better than nothing but everyone has access to it’s limited data so there is no edge.
Liverpool and City have very good in house analytical teams which would be Champions league level.
Jamestown Analytics and Smartodds algorithms are like peak Barcelona.
Having them working for you won’t guarantee you trophies because teams like Brighton and Brentford cannot afford Haaland but they can mean you consistently over perform compared to your budget..watch the film Moneyball.
If all PL teams had the same spending power and everything was equal, Brighton and Brentford would be clear of the field but that will never happen so the measure has to be how are they doing with the resources they have.
I hope I have answered your questions.