Balotelli & City agree settlement!

Re: Balotelli & City agree settlement!

The cookie monster said:
moomba said:
The cookie monster said:
Is that his get out of jail card?
Who cares

People are suggesting over and over again that no-one in football would want him.if he became available.

Ballon d'Or shows that people in the football world do rate his ability so the chances are there would be clubs interested.
When i say no fucker wants him, it wont be for silly money
We will take a hit on him thats for sure.
He's a liability.

Cause people nominate players for Ballon d'Or awards because they think they're liabilities?

Just might be that others rightly or wrongly rate him higher than you do.

And if and when the time comes that he's sold it won't be your opinion of him that determines the price clubs are willing to pay.
 
moomba said:
The cookie monster said:
moomba said:
People are suggesting over and over again that no-one in football would want him.if he became available.

Ballon d'Or shows that people in the football world do rate his ability so the chances are there would be clubs interested.
When i say no fucker wants him, it wont be for silly money
We will take a hit on him thats for sure.
He's a liability.

Cause people nominate players for Ballon d'Or awards because they think they're liabilities?

Just might be that others rightly or wrongly rate him higher than you do.

And if and when the time comes that he's sold it won't be your opinion of him that determines the price clubs are willing to pay.
In his 3 years here what do you think of him
Poor
Average
Good
Very good
Excellant
A superstar
 
pudge said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
pudge said:
I understand what your saying, but with the exception of the Liverpool sending off, Mario missed 10 games deservedly.

That's a lot of games to miss, when you've invested heavily in the player.

Im not going to argue this any more I agree with a rule that stops lower league players getting screwed over it has to be all encompassing so that's all there is to it
What if a lower league player stamped on someone, and got sent off deservedly 2/3 in a season and missed a third of the season due to his own actions?



then he would be fined for the cards and if he had shown any dissent during the sending off, fined for that

the rules for missing games after cards are made by the governing bodies....as a player you cannot neccessarily garauntee that you will get a card or not for tackles or challenges....you are entirely at the discretion of the referee.

and whilst i understand and sympathise that marios actions sometimes gave the referee no option but to issue card(s) and with it the associated match ban.....in marios and the unions eyes, it could be argued that this was entirely out of the players hands as there is not enough consistency with refreeeing decisions
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
pudge said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Im not going to argue this any more I agree with a rule that stops lower league players getting screwed over it has to be all encompassing so that's all there is to it
What if a lower league player stamped on someone, and got sent off deservedly 2/3 in a season and missed a third of the season due to his own actions?

Then im sure his club wouldn't come back 7 months later and try and fine him for it unless they had a point to prove
And that point would be that they had one of their players unavailable for selection, due to the player's actions (nobody else)

They lost out on performances from the player, and hence their investment (like we did with Mario)

I feel that that warrants a punishment/fine.

It's my opinion, I know those aren't the set rules, I just don't agree with them
 
Re: Balotelli & City agree settlement!

The cookie monster said:
moomba said:
The cookie monster said:
When i say no fucker wants him, it wont be for silly money
We will take a hit on him thats for sure.
He's a liability.

Cause people nominate players for Ballon d'Or awards because they think they're liabilities?

Just might be that others rightly or wrongly rate him higher than you do.

And if and when the time comes that he's sold it won't be your opinion of him that determines the price clubs are willing to pay.
In his 3 years here what do you think of him
Poor
Average
Good
Very good
Excellant
A superstar

Average. My opinion of him won't determine his price tag either.
 
shadygiz said:
pudge said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Im not going to argue this any more I agree with a rule that stops lower league players getting screwed over it has to be all encompassing so that's all there is to it
What if a lower league player stamped on someone, and got sent off deservedly 2/3 in a season and missed a third of the season due to his own actions?



then he would be fined for the cards and if he had shown any dissent during the sending off, fined for that

the rules for missing games after cards are made by the governing bodies....as a player you cannot neccessarily garauntee that you will get a card or not for tackles or challenges....you are entirely at the discretion of the referee.

and whilst i understand and sympathise that marios actions sometimes gave the referee no option but to issue card(s) and with it the associated match ban.....in marios and the unions eyes, it could be argued that this was entirely out of the players hands as there is not enough consistency with refreeeing decisions
Again, I fully understand what people are saying.

I personally just don't agree with the rules.

That's all really
 
moomba said:
The cookie monster said:
moomba said:
Cause people nominate players for Ballon d'Or awards because they think they're liabilities?

Just might be that others rightly or wrongly rate him higher than you do.

And if and when the time comes that he's sold it won't be your opinion of him that determines the price clubs are willing to pay.
In his 3 years here what do you think of him
Poor
Average
Good
Very good
Excellant
A superstar

Average.
Glad ive converted you
Welcome on board :)
 
pudge said:
shadygiz said:
pudge said:
He didn't miss any games for totting up of cards?

He was being fined for missing 11 games through the Liverpool and Arsenal red cards and his stamp on Parker


but thats against his unions rules, he had already been fined by the club for the cards
He missed a almost a third of the season due to his actions.

Surely a two week fine is acceptable?

Seems that it must be ,as he`s now accepted a fine of some sort,irrespective of how much.He was advised badly (IMO) and realised the harm it could possibly do,to the one person who has supported him more than anyone else.
 
Re: Balotelli & City agree settlement!

The cookie monster said:
moomba said:
The cookie monster said:
In his 3 years here what do you think of him
Poor
Average
Good
Very good
Excellant
A superstar

Average.
Glad ive converted you
Welcome on board :)

My opinion hasn't changed since I started posting on this thread.
 
oakiecokie said:
pudge said:
shadygiz said:
but thats against his unions rules, he had already been fined by the club for the cards
He missed a almost a third of the season due to his actions.

Surely a two week fine is acceptable?

Seems that it must be ,as he`s now accepted a fine of some sort,irrespective of how much.He was advised badly (IMO) and realised the harm it could possibly do,to the one person who has supported him more than anyone else.
Wether he was badly advised or not
Mario has the final say
He wanted to take our club to a tribunal
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.