balotelli elbowed at stoke

[waspish]

It was a red Crappingburg was looking straight at it for me and just thought oh it Mario not giving it don't want any ban now because it helps other team not us! What should happen is if a player gets a red he should be banned the following game against the team he had a red

 

[Neville Kneville]

We must have a ref watch to silence the do gooders on here, the rags were assisted to 89pts last year and it nearly cost us the title I don't want to allow it to happen again this season.

If you look at the so called 'handball' at Anfield from which Suarez scored, & the basketball goal yesterday, refs have already handed the rags a 4 point advantage.

 

[Skashion]

Nothing happened to Huth for his disgraceful elbow on Balotelli in the FA Cup Final as I recall so why should be there be any action now. If Balotelli's involved, Balotelli's to blame. Nasty fucker, always running into the elbows of Stoke players trying to get them sent off.

 

[Deleted member 14625]

It was a red Crappingburg was looking straight at it for me and just thought oh it Mario not giving it don't want any ban now because it helps other team not us! What should happen is if a player gets a red he should be banned the following game against the team he had a red

I completely agree with that.

If Wilkinson is banned next week how does that benefit City? Well, it doesn't. So I don't care whether he's banned or not.

If the rules were different and he was found guilty of the arm in the face (it wasn't terrible, there's no way it hurt Mario so rolling around on the floor was a bit soft and wasn't needed but it was an arm in the face nonetheless) he should serve his ban in the next game Stoke play against us.

 

[hgblue]

It was a red Crappingburg was looking straight at it for me and just thought oh it Mario not giving it don't want any ban now because it helps other team not us! What should happen is if a player gets a red he should be banned the following game against the team he had a red

That doesn't really help us though, because Stoke would just bring a replacement in who's just as good, and we lose the advantage we would have had of playing against ten men. The only answer to cheating/incompetent referees is Video Technology.

 

[bernabias home shirt]

Cundy and Quinn were just on about this
In fact cundy said straight red,and he was amazed no coverage in the papers
He did say if it had been balo using the elbow it would of been front an back page.

 

[Deleted member 14625]

It was a red Crappingburg was looking straight at it for me and just thought oh it Mario not giving it don't want any ban now because it helps other team not us! What should happen is if a player gets a red he should be banned the following game against the team he had a red

That doesn't really help us though, because Stoke would just bring a replacement in who's just as good, and we lose the advantage we would have had of playing against ten men. The only answer to cheating/incompetent referees is Video Technology.

This is the biggest thing that is needed in football for me.

I actually get a bit fed up with people moaning about the refs after comments like "I've seen seven replays now and how the ref missed that I don't know"...well you've just answered that yourself you daft twat - the ref saw no replays! It is too easy for officials to miss incidents in football and it's making the sport a bit of a joke. Plus there are too many footballers who are diving wankers and it makes the officials job even harder.

Why 'goal line' stuff has been the big push is completely beyond me. You get a contentious goal line incident maybe once or twice a season, that's it. So it's barely important.

There should be a video ref at every game who is there to review direct incidents leading up to goals, penalty/no penalty decisions, and red card/not red card decisions.

The game would be infinitely better with it.


I'm just watching the football league show and Chris Powell has just said "I've seen a few relays of it and the red obviously didn't have that, he's apologised for the mistake he made and I've accepted that".
Also Laudrup said the other week that having seen the replay he thinks his man should have been sent off but the ref didn't have the opportunity of a replay and there's not much he can do.

 

[hgblue]

It was a red Crappingburg was looking straight at it for me and just thought oh it Mario not giving it don't want any ban now because it helps other team not us! What should happen is if a player gets a red he should be banned the following game against the team he had a red

That doesn't really help us though, because Stoke would just bring a replacement in who's just as good, and we lose the advantage we would have had of playing against ten men. The only answer to cheating/incompetent referees is Video Technology.

This is the biggest thing that is needed in football for me.

I actually get a bit fed up with people moaning about the refs after comments like "I've seen seven replays now and how the ref missed that I don't know"...well you've just answered that yourself you daft twat - the ref saw no replays! It is too easy for officials to miss incidents in football and it's making the sport a bit of a joke. Plus there are too many footballers who are diving wankers and it makes the officials job even harder.

Why 'goal line' stuff has been the big push is completely beyond me. You get a contentious goal line incident maybe once or twice a season, that's it. So it's barely important.

There should be a video ref at every game who is there to review direct incidents leading up to goals, penalty/no penalty decisions, and red card/not red card decisions.

The game would be infinitely better with it.

Once it comes in, if it ever does come in, it will be one of those things that people will say 'why the hell didn't we do this years ago?'. Just too many luddites and dinosaurs in high places standing in the way for it to happen at the moment. Yesterday was a perfect example of two game changing decisions that the officials got wrong, and this is happening in game after game, week after week. The technology is there to stop this happening, but we don't use it. It's a joke.

 

[hertsblue]

He play acts so much,
nobody believes when something really happens.
It's his own fault.

Wellbeck seems to get rewarded for all his play acting

 

[Deleted member 14625]

That doesn't really help us though, because Stoke would just bring a replacement in who's just as good, and we lose the advantage we would have had of playing against ten men. The only answer to cheating/incompetent referees is Video Technology.

This is the biggest thing that is needed in football for me.

I actually get a bit fed up with people moaning about the refs after comments like "I've seen seven replays now and how the ref missed that I don't know"...well you've just answered that yourself you daft twat - the ref saw no replays! It is too easy for officials to miss incidents in football and it's making the sport a bit of a joke. Plus there are too many footballers who are diving wankers and it makes the officials job even harder.

Why 'goal line' stuff has been the big push is completely beyond me. You get a contentious goal line incident maybe once or twice a season, that's it. So it's barely important.

There should be a video ref at every game who is there to review direct incidents leading up to goals, penalty/no penalty decisions, and red card/not red card decisions.

The game would be infinitely better with it.

Once it comes in, if it ever does come in, it will be one of those things that people will say 'why the hell didn't we do this years ago?'. Just too many luddites and dinosaurs in high places standing in the way for it to happen at the moment. Yesterday was a perfect example of two game changing decisions that the officials got wrong, and this is happening in game after game, week after week. The technology is there to stop this happening, but we don't use it. It's a joke.

The sad thing is the whole game is run by Luddites and dinosaurs from top to bottom. And even if it wasn't there a loads of fans who are against Video Tech and many of their reasons are because "it would take too long and stop too much play".

The thing is, in the time it takes for eight players to surrounded the ref and go mental at opposition players and all officials, the video ref could have cleared up the whole incident.

Football is officiated like it's 1912, not 2012. And people wonder why there are so many poor decisions.