Re: Mario now getting a lot of stick from home fans.
Tevez has a track record all right. There was nothing wrong with Mario wanting to take the free kick on that side of the pitch. In fact IT MADE SENSE. Footballers are not and should not be, robots. They have to adapt to the game situation. K's free kicks hadn't worked so it was time for a change. Mario wanted to give it a go, Kolorov's actions were out of order - in my opinion of course
Well maybe after watching K's other attempts fail, Mario thought he could offer something different?
franksinatra said:CC1 said:franksinatra said:Why should it be Marios turn?. Funnily no other players demanded to take the free kicks because that decision is decided by the manager and on the training ground.
Mario is not our free kick taker, Kolarov is when he is on the pitch. Mario did what he did best later with a great goal. Praise him for that because he deserves it, but the frre kick issue was solely his fault and reflected by the attitudes of the players
Yes and maybe Dzeko, De Jong, Johnson, Kompany, Pizarro, Tevez and others may have felt the same are they all entitiled to demand the free kick?
And a large scale argument to follow? The answer is no, hence the reason one free kick taker is designated by the manager as a response to the performances of the players on the training field.
If Kolarov was not to take it, then it should fall to Tevez because he has a proven track record in those situations.
Tevez has a track record all right. There was nothing wrong with Mario wanting to take the free kick on that side of the pitch. In fact IT MADE SENSE. Footballers are not and should not be, robots. They have to adapt to the game situation. K's free kicks hadn't worked so it was time for a change. Mario wanted to give it a go, Kolorov's actions were out of order - in my opinion of course
Well maybe after watching K's other attempts fail, Mario thought he could offer something different?