I meant personally, but yeah you’re rightThat ref was a right **** all right, Demichelis should have chinned him.
I meant personally, but yeah you’re rightThat ref was a right **** all right, Demichelis should have chinned him.
And that is the truth. I am not a Bayern fan by any stretch of imagination but @Maldeika is correct here. Hoeness did not pay tax correctly of his private investments. This had nothing to do with Bayern. Also he did his time in jail so that should be that.Wrong...
Who should that have been?
Hoeneß was in prison for tax fraud of his private taxes. But that is not corruption.
I'm pretty sure they plan on buying a bigger rug and brushCome on UEFA, what the f*** are you going to do about Barcelona, considering you've been hounding City for 10 years on behalf of your cartel clubs, which includes Barcelona?
Come on UEFA, what the f*** are you going to do about Barcelona, considering you've been hounding City for 10 years on behalf of your cartel clubs, which includes Barcelona?
As far as I know, no-one has ever suggested what Hoeness did was related to company business. But surely there's a moral issue here - why would he then be re-elected as Bayern president? Anyone jailed for tax offences - private or otherwise - would surely be jettisoned by their employer and never given another job by that same employer. In addition, Hoeness has no right to lecture MCFC on financial affairs when he's a convicted tax dodger.And that is the truth. I am not a Bayern fan by any stretch of imagination but @Maldeika is correct here. Hoeness did not pay tax correctly of his private investments. This had nothing to do with Bayern. Also he did his time in jail so that should be that.
Yes .....if I was Barca I wouldn't say too much, or something to that effectThat Pep quote was my first thought when I heard this news. He knew...
I agree that Hoeness has no right to lecture City. For so many different reasons. He is an arrogant **** in my book and a hypocrite too. When he was released from jail he ran for office again and was elected by the members of Bayern Munich.As far as I know, no-one has ever suggested what Hoeness did was related to company business. But surely there's a moral issue here - why would he then be re-elected as Bayern president? Anyone jailed for tax offences - private or otherwise - would surely be jettisoned by their employer and never given another job by that same employer. In addition, Hoeness has no right to lecture MCFC on financial affairs when he's a convicted tax dodger.
Edit: I've just seen what @City Raider posted, but he hasn't actually said it was a Bayern matter - just that they were Hoeness's employers at the time.
No, they're simple common criminals, he and his mate. The public face of the most pretentious club in football?Wrong...
Who should that have been?
Hoeneß was in prison for tax fraud of his private taxes. But that is not corruption.
But this isn't a La Liga matter only, else why did the Catalan police arrest the three officials?Rangers as an entity ceased to exist and lost their place in the league pyramid due to factors outside of the SFA's remit. Then the rest of the league clubs decided not to vote to make an exemption and rightly so. NewCo Rangers then started from the bottom again. If it was an SFA only issue they wouldn't have gotten more than a fine and maybe a small points deduction as it hurt the SFA badly financially.