leonoon said:
Ha! Someone tried to blame Tevez for the first goal. Ridiculous indeed.
The way I saw it is that, Tevez tried to get hold of the ball because it seemed the defenders having had a hard time getting the ball out of Man City own half. But Meireles got there first, and kicked and perhaps hurt his hamstring in the process. The rest was history.
This is not an opinion. It is a fact. There is no "how I saw it" there is just how it happened. Milner dumbly, chipped the ball into the middle of our half instead of booting out (albeit no one seems to remember or say shit about that) then Dzeko gets beat to the ball by a red. The ball pops in the air towards Tevez, who chest control was poor and let the ball pop forward and Carrol lunged in and knocked it away from him. Factuallt speaking here - Tevez had the ball couldn't control it and showed too much and lost it. In short, TEVEZ LOST THE BALL. Clearly your bias has given you a poor recreation of the facts. Check it, and come back to apologize. :)
Because of this trivial thing, you blame Tevez? Ridiculous.
I did not blame Tevez, the goal was all Carroll. But Tevez did lose possession of the ball. That is just a fact. Not a blame.
And you said Silva would have change the game if he started. Then tell me one thing:
When was Silva during the Chelsea game? Was he so good that he shouldn't be taking the blame of the loss of that game?
Can you point me to where I stated Silva would have changed the game if he started? I don't recall making any such claim. I am not God, and don't know what SIlva would have done. I can only "accurately" recite what actually happened.
Talk about not being biased yourself!