As I've said a few times, I don't care about how moderation works behind the scenes or even call your general moderating into question. I'm referencing your posts and you as a poster. It's because you bring the fact you're moderator to your posts so frequently that sets you aside, hence mine and others posts.
Your responses are now all along the same lines of how illogical my thoughts are etc, usual Damo style, so I'm going to duck out of this one now, I'm not adding anything to it and neither are you having to field my questions.
Sad thing is that even if this WAS an issue of right and wrong and I was 100% right I still wouldn't win the argument with you. The lack of diplomacy on your part is stifling many threads.
That's the "monarchy" for you I suppose, are you a frustrated Charles chomping at the bit by the way?
Anyway, I'll go back to lurking, screaming at my screen and posting periodically because it's like flogging a dead horse this one and I don't even know why I bothered in the first place.
The problem that you've suffered here is that to win an argument with me you actually have to say something that isn't total bollocks, and alas that's where most of your points have fell down.
If you like others in the thread said something that is even vaguely approaching interesting then I acknowledge it, address it and move on. Because I'm not petrified of changing my opinion on things and won't stick to ideas that are obviously false in the opinion of qualified and independent experts like you did with stony.
Maybe that's a symptom of my condition, a recognition that often I know what I'm talking about better than others and the corollary of such is that others often know better than me about what they're talking about? A truly immense sickness I possess there.