Battle of the Bands Final - Beatles v Rolling Stones 217

[everythingchangesbutblue]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

Let me just state now that although Jo Guest was robbed in the page 3 contest and I took it on the chin, despite Sian being knocked out of round 1 in the Coronation Street Babes contest and taking it like a man and Claudia Marie being mocked mercilessly on the Adult Actress Contest, if the Stone Roses go out in this round I shall have to consider throwing my toys from the pram and calling it a day with this thread.

Now you've been warned.

I'm with this.

The Stone Roses hit perfection briefly.

Zep were good, very good but never perfect. The Roses were perfect.[/qu

zep were perfect numerous times, zep 1-3,untitled and physical graffiti are perfect albums.i know its personal taste but if anyone really thinks the stone roses are better than zep then theres no hope.

 

[jalfrezi-crazy]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

Led Zep

 

[tonea2003]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

if i'm reaching for a cd to put on
i would never choose led zep in front of the stone roses stairway to heaven excluded
so the stone roses it is for me

 

[Davs 19]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

For a short period the Roses were everything, perfection. Zep were very good but never close to everything or perfection.

Only one band impacted my life more than the Roses.

Stone Roses by a distance for me.

 

[DavidSilvasLeftFoot]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

This is a good one. I listen to Stone Roses more than Led Zep because its more my generation and my sort of music. They were actually still active while I've been alive. Led Zep were my Dads generation. But Led Zep are probably the best ensemble of talented rock musicians you'll ever get. They released eight albums and all of the songs are really technical.

 

[Anonymous]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

Led Zepellin's importance in hugely overstated in my opinion. Screaching "baby, baby, baby, baby..." for 20 mins whilst some heroin fiend noodles you to boredom with their guitar is not my idea of fun - but each to their own I guess.

Stone Roses for me.

 

[manimanc]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

fuck me led zep do a cover of rolf harris`s stairway to heaven and they become rock gods...phhrrtt!!!

the roses all day everyday,even without the reunion they got more game than page and plant...

 

[tonea2003]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

This is a good one. I listen to Stone Roses more than Led Zep because its more my generation and my sort of music. They were actually still active while I've been alive. Led Zep were my Dads generation. But Led Zep are probably the best ensemble of talented rock musicians you'll ever get. They released eight albums and all of the songs are really technical.

not sure who you have chosen here mate

 

[Anonymous]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

Surely there's more to it than just technical capability? I mean, punk was not exactly technical but produced some of the most energetic, feisty, powerful and passionate music.

Led Zep leave me cold. Same with Queen. A lot of Floyd does too.

 

[MCFCpassion]

Re: Battle of the Bands - Led Zeppelin v Stone Roses page 146

The Stone Roses.