Bayern v City post match thread

MaineRoadBlue said:
Why have Plzen qualified after losing away 3-2 to CSKA but winning 2-1 at home.

Head to Head would men CSKA having scored 4 to Plzen's 3 mean it should have been them!

Perhaps Pellers was correct and Sky have it wrong.
Eh?!

3-2 + 1-2 = 4-4

Because Plzen scored 2 away goals they progress ahead of the racists on away goals head-to-head.
 
Eric Wirral said:
MaineRoadBlue said:
Why have Plzen qualified after losing away 3-2 to CSKA but winning 2-1 at home.

Head to Head would men CSKA having scored 4 to Plzen's 3 mean it should have been them!

Perhaps Pellers was correct and Sky have it wrong.

4-4 so goes on away goals. Which is why we would have topped the group by scoring 4 away from home.

It is not 4-4 it is 4-3 in CSKA's favor

My bad, obviously I shouldn't be doing math either.
 
MillionDollarDream said:
Chippy_boy said:
Tiebreakers

The teams are ranked according to points (3 points for a win, 1 point for a tie, 0 points for a loss). If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings:[1]
1.higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the teams in question;
2.superior goal difference from the group matches played among the teams in question;
3.higher number of goals scored in the group matches played among the teams in question;
4.higher number of goals scored away from home in the group matches played among the teams in question;
5.If, after applying criteria 1) to 4) to several teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1) to 4) are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6) to 8) apply;
6.superior goal difference from all group matches played;
7.higher number of goals scored from all group matches played;
8.higher number of coefficient points accumulated by the club in question, as well as its association, over the previous five seasons.

I know we're all getting our knickers in a twist about the possibility of 4-2 and topping the group.

But doesn't the above mean that it goes on goal difference after equal points??? So in that case 4-2 would not have been enlighten and MP was right?

We would have been tied with the amount of goals scored had it been 4-2 ,5-2 would have us on top, MP was right.
Away goals double up.
 
MillionDollarDream said:
Chippy_boy said:
Tiebreakers

The teams are ranked according to points (3 points for a win, 1 point for a tie, 0 points for a loss). If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings:[1]
1.higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the teams in question;
2.superior goal difference from the group matches played among the teams in question;
3.higher number of goals scored in the group matches played among the teams in question;
4.higher number of goals scored away from home in the group matches played among the teams in question;
5.If, after applying criteria 1) to 4) to several teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1) to 4) are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6) to 8) apply;
6.superior goal difference from all group matches played;
7.higher number of goals scored from all group matches played;
8.higher number of coefficient points accumulated by the club in question, as well as its association, over the previous five seasons.

I know we're all getting our knickers in a twist about the possibility of 4-2 and topping the group.

But doesn't the above mean that it goes on goal difference after equal points??? So in that case 4-2 would not have been enlighten and MP was right?

We would have been tied with the amount of goals scored had it been 4-2 ,5-2 would have us on top, MP was right.

We'd have scored 4 away goals to Bayerns 3 that would have put us top.
 
Tarlos Kevez said:
We go 3-2 up and Pellers brings on Negredo (a striker last time I checked) for Silva (a midfielder last time I checked) and he doesn't understand that we needed another goal? What are you Sky sympathisers on???

Don't let the interviewers deliberate trap of "were you not tempted to bring your best striker Aguero on" and thus try to make a twat out of Pellers confuse you.

Proud of everyone associated with City tonight.

CTID!!!
Too right . Rock on!
 
One comment only. Fuckin brilliant blues. A credit to the club and we'll done Garcia, Edin, Milner, Demichelis, Kolarov and Fernandinho . silva was awesome. OK that's probably at least five comments. And one more - Sky are a fuckin disgrace.
 
paphos-mcfc said:
Scum are top are they not???? I fucking beg and hope we get them in the draw. My cock will be out ready for a session.
We can't draw them unfortunately
 
paphos-mcfc said:
Scum are top are they not???? I fucking beg and hope we get them in the draw. My cock will be out ready for a session.

Unless you're talking about another scum we can't play United in the next round
 
A genuine mistake by Pellegrini

Oh well you have to laugh. We will raise our game against a better club
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.