kurious oranj
Well-Known Member
I mean if he is acquitted of the other charges as well.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Benjamin Mendy - City lose case and Mendy awarded £11m in back pay (p168)
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
Constantine
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I was thinking the compensation would come from the government instead of the employer.Why would we pay him when he was unavailable for work?
Surely if acquitted the cunts at the home office have to pay? If you deprive someone on a living for 4 years and don’t get a conviction you pay for incompetenceHe'll get backdated pay from City, apparently. I know someone who knows him and this is what he's been told. No idea how much.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
He still wasn’t available for work. He was locked up.I mean if he is acquitted of the other charges as well.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
You would think. I would assume that he would have to sue who prevented him from earning a wage.Yeah, I was thinking the compensation would come from the government instead of the employer.
Constantine
Well-Known Member
Just a thought. I'm ignorant in these things, that's why I asked.You would think. I would assume that he would have to sue who prevented him from earning a wage.
Stephen230
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 7,536
- Team supported
- MCFC
What happens if he's acquitted of all charges? Compensation? Just curious.
He would have to prove that he was the victim of a malicious prosecution to claim compensation. The amount of time this has dragged on, if he does get a not guilty on the remaining charges, I’d guess the last thing he’d want is to be back in a courtroom any time soon.
Stephen230
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 7,536
- Team supported
- MCFC
Surely if acquitted the cunts at the home office have to pay? If you deprive someone on a living for 4 years and don’t get a conviction you pay for incompetence
Not sure what any of it has got to do with the Home Office?
In any case, just because the prosecution fail to convince a jury of someone’s guilt, doesn’t automatically mean it was wrong to bring charges.
Constantine
Well-Known Member
Thanks. Find it hard to accept though.He would have to prove that he was the victim of a malicious prosecution to claim compensation. The amount of time this has dragged on, if he does get a not guilty on the remaining charges, I’d guess the last thing he’d want is to be back in a courtroom any time soon.
Morality is: don't get accused if you're innocent.
But if proven innocent and he’s been deprived of 10m in wages he’s got to have a recourse surely?Not sure what any of it has got to do with the Home Office?
In any case, just because the prosecution fail to convince a jury of someone’s guilt, doesn’t automatically mean it was wrong to bring charges.