I have to smile, purely in good taste but..... is this "not been proven innocent" stance going to apply to Huw Edwards?
Seriously, no offence intended.
Maybe we need a third verdict a la Scotland.... Case unproven?
We won’t need to discuss the differences between being found not guilty and being actually innocent with Huw Edwards because there’s not going to be a criminal trial.
I genuinely don’t think there’s a single person in this thread who can’t understand that not guilty =/= innocent and that some people will not be taking this verdict to be proof Mendy did nothing wrong.
It’s all performative, pretend bullshit, it’s all because the crime in question is rape, so we have to deal with the usual “when’s international MENS day?!!!” Type posters who like to take a not guilty verdict in a case like this as an excuse to partake in some misogyny and call all the women involved liars and false accusers and demand they are punished - when actually this case showed pretty clearly that false accusations are easily rooted out.
I dread to think how many posts the mods have had to remove in the last few hours.