Perhaps it has more to do with your reading that what was said. I never said that about Sessegnon.Well when people are accountable to absolute fuck all, opinions (based on zero research, mind) quickly become facts. I mean how can people claim that they are absolutely confident that Bernat or say Sessegnon is better than Mendy. Who the fuck has time to watch Fulham play in the championship week in, week out? And if people haven't done that, then how the fuck are they even drawing these absurd comparisons?
Brilliant trolling if true, not even signed and already clarkied bluemoon.
On the contrary, its the position I don't rate. I quite like Mendy just fine. He is a great crosser, moves explosively forward, good at battling possession and an aggressive defender. Also has good strength and athletism. He is an okay tackler,. Has.average defensive positioning, and his passing is iffy, he loses more Ariel battles than his physique suggests he should, plus he has an injury history. So, no I'd conclude he is a 22 -25 million player in an inflated economy.i'm getting the feeling that Dax doesnt rate Mendy .... lol
Perhaps it has more to do with your reading that what was said. I never said that about Sessegnon.
And for what its worth, this nonsense of "oh you couldn't have seen that many games" is a silly retort. I have seen about 8 to 10 games of Theo, I only needed the 1st two to be convinced. The others only helped my n
Knolege. I've seen Monaco at least 20 times thus season so about 12 to 15 of those involved Mendy. But even if it were the case that I had seen less it still won't matter.
No one questions my opinion about Delph even though I've only seen him 4 or 5 to.re this year. Yet when I or anyone else opines about Delph none of the "muppet makers" moan about having not seen enough of him. Nor so they disavow themselves of their opinions on limited knowledge.
Sure I've seen David and Kev more than Theo or Mendy. But I have an accurate enough picture of both Mendy and Theo. And I didn't need 30 games to do it.
So I always laugh when folks come with the "Oh I bet you've only seen so and so games."
Perhaps it has more to do with your reading that what was said. I never said that about Sessegnon.
And for what its worth, this nonsense of "oh you couldn't have seen that many games" is a silly retort. I have seen about 8 to 10 games of Theo, I only needed the 1st two to be convinced. The others only helped my n
Knolege. I've seen Monaco at least 20 times thus season so about 12 to 15 of those involved Mendy. But even if it were the case that I had seen less it still won't matter.
No one questions my opinion about Delph even though I've only seen him 4 or 5 to.re this year. Yet when I or anyone else opines about Delph none of the "muppet makers" moan about having not seen enough of him. Nor so they disavow themselves of their opinions on limited knowledge.
Sure I've seen David and Kev more than Theo or Mendy. But I have an accurate enough picture of both Mendy and Theo. And I didn't need 30 games to do it.
So I always laugh when folks come with the "Oh I bet you've only seen so and so games."
Nevertheless you can still form an opinion of what you have seen - it's just that for that opinion to be valid you needProfessionals, which are people not only chosen for their exceptional ability to spot talent but also have very expensive qualifications and training in this area take a minimum of 10 games to make a decision on a recommendation.
If you've done it in two your opinion is, as I suspected, pointless