Bernardo Silva

Status
Not open for further replies.
BJL_City said:
yes, but Jesus came in to start, clearly. I don't think Silva would to the same extent, thus I don't think we'd really approach him for that money and he'd go somewhere where he would be first choice anyway.
Click to expand...
That is crap man, Silva would be a stud for us
 
I predict that he'll go to united and in his first interview he'll explain that Jose was the only one to call him directly.

They won't go long without a copycat Jesus signing.
 
gomer27 said:
That is crap man, Silva would be a stud for us
Click to expand...

Who are you dropping then? because I wouldn't drop any of our front 5, with Jesus also there, he would only be a squad player because of the talent we already have in those positions.

It's not that he isn't really good, but we already have really good. So it's not crap at all, it's a reality that we aren't Pep/Tito Barca yet and can't just keep Sanchez/Fabregas/Pedro on the bench, so players like Silva will want to be the star and there are other top clubs who have the room available and would make it priority. We have other priorities to spend our budget and will look to bring in players in that area with room to grow and not at their peak, so will take a squad role and see it as an opportunity to compete and impress under Pep.
 
First time I had seen him, looks a terrific player that I would imagine Pep would love in the squad - he's a Mendes client however and as such, the usual links with United probably give them an advantage
 
FCBarca said:
First time I had seen him, looks a terrific player that I would imagine Pep would love in the squad - he's a Mendes client however and as such, the usual links with United probably give them an advantage
Click to expand...

According to the player, advantage for no-one right now.
According to the supps, advantage to the squad who can give him a spot in the starting 11 (2018 world cup). Or Monaco. Depends mainly on who win the league.
 
BJL_City said:
Who are you dropping then? because I wouldn't drop any of our front 5, with Jesus also there, he would only be a squad player because of the talent we already have in those positions.

It's not that he isn't really good, but we already have really good. So it's not crap at all, it's a reality that we aren't Pep/Tito Barca yet and can't just keep Sanchez/Fabregas/Pedro on the bench, so players like Silva will want to be the star and there are other top clubs who have the room available and would make it priority. We have other priorities to spend our budget and will look to bring in players in that area with room to grow and not at their peak, so will take a squad role and see it as an opportunity to compete and impress under Pep.
Click to expand...
We are playing in 4 comps usually, there are plenty of starts to go along. Especially since our Silva won't be around forever. The lack of talent at some positions behind our starters in pathetic
 
BJL_City said:
yes, but Jesus came in to start, clearly. I don't think Silva would to the same extent, thus I don't think we'd really approach him for that money and he'd go somewhere where he would be first choice anyway.
Click to expand...

He'll play if he was to come to us. There's no chance he'd play for Barca because he doesn't suit their system and also wouldn't replace any of their front 3.
I agree with you though that we won't approach him
 
Was watching some highlights of his time at Monaco on my lunchbreak earlier (Yes, I know, highlights!). He really reminds me of Griezmann during his time at Sociedad.
 
gomer27 said:
We are playing in 4 comps usually, there are plenty of starts to go along. Especially since our Silva won't be around forever. The lack of talent at some positions behind our starters in pathetic
Click to expand...
Frustrates me that some people still don't get this, we need more than 11 players of starting quality.
 
pee dubya said:
Frustrates me that some people still don't get this, we need more than 11 players of starting quality.
Click to expand...

it's you who don't get it, players like Bernardo Silva don't move clubs to sit on the bench for half the season to watch Sterling & Sane. They go where they will be absolute first choice.
 
BJL_City said:
it's you who don't get it, players like Bernardo Silva don't move clubs to sit on the bench for half the season to watch Sterling & Sane. They go where they will be absolute first choice.
Click to expand...
If he wants to be guaranteed first choice he can go and sign for Arsenal and live in a little comfort zone bubble. If he wants to play at a club competing to actually win things, he's going to need to fight for a place, no matter how expensive or good he is.
 
Dax777 said:
In that case we should want Brandt that and Isco.

Brandt can play Wing or AM and isco can play pivot or AM. That would be the smart play. Personally I want 3 speed wingers so ill get Mbappe instead of Brandt

My head says Brant is by far the no brainer choice. Bit something about Mbappe's potential excites me.
Click to expand...

I think Isco is ideal because he is so versatile, he can also do a job on the wing.
The one person people seem to be forgetting is Patrick Roberts as a Navas replacement. That would mean we would have Isco/Silva/Kev in the middle and Jesus/Sane/sterling/Roberts for wide meaning the question is what happens with Kun?
 
I don't get the B.Silva > Isco opinion if i'm being honest. Yes he has been good this season but Isco still is a far better player in my opinion. I think majority of us got impressed by his performance against us the other night and rightly so, but apart from really good dribbling and a few cut through passes he wasn't that influential in their final third. Yes he has the potential to become a top top player, but so does Isco. He is still just 2 years older than Silva.
I think Isco has been really good for Real whenever he has played and I think his lack of regular game time has taken a toll on his repo among us fans.

Bernardo Silva has 6 goals and 7 assists (inc. pen) in 1950 minutes for Monaco in the French League. Whereas, Isco has just played half of that (973minutes) and already has 5 goals and 5 assists, in a far tougher league.

Considering all that and the fact that we could get him for 1/3rd of Silva's price makes it a no brainer for me.

hOO3rlQ.jpg
 
He looked ok against us but my one abiding memory was him running in circles until he lost the ball because he couldnt use his right foot. If we are looking for Davids successor and I'm not sure we are yet , I'd prefer Isco.
 
bluesingh said:
I don't get the B.Silva > Isco opinion if i'm being honest. Yes he has been good this season but Isco still is a far better player in my opinion. I think majority of us got impressed by his performance against us the other night and rightly so, but apart from really good dribbling and a few cut through passes he wasn't that influential in their final third. Yes he has the potential to become a top top player, but so does Isco. He is still just 2 years older than Silva.
I think Isco has been really good for Real whenever he has played and I think his lack of regular game time has taken a toll on his repo among us fans.

Bernardo Silva has 6 goals and 7 assists (inc. pen) in 1950 minutes for Monaco in the French League. Whereas, Isco has just played half of that (973minutes) and already has 5 goals and 5 assists, in a far tougher league.

Considering all that and the fact that we could get him for 1/3rd of Silva's price makes it a no brainer for me.

hOO3rlQ.jpg
Click to expand...
Thanks for putting up the stats, but anyone who has seen enough of both this year doesn't need the stat to know Isco is better.

I think the fact that he spurned us once and now doesn't have a starting role, have let those who don't watch him, concluding he must just not be that good.

Nothing is farther from the truth. He is a superstar. And wherever he goes next year that team will get an instant star. Hope its here. He is going to dominate.
 
Very left footed.

He's okay. But I think if we are looking for a Silva replacement then we can do better.
 
g180aj said:
I think Isco is ideal because he is so versatile, he can also do a job on the wing.
The one person people seem to be forgetting is Patrick Roberts as a Navas replacement. That would mean we would have Isco/Silva/Kev in the middle and Jesus/Sane/sterling/Roberts for wide meaning the question is what happens with Kun?
Click to expand...
He bang the goals in
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top