hilts
Well-Known Member
As with gas, water, care homes, public transport etc. They can be privatised, but you’ll end up paying more for a shitter service.
Outside of BT and maybe the post office i think privatisation has been a disaster.
As with gas, water, care homes, public transport etc. They can be privatised, but you’ll end up paying more for a shitter service.
There does need to be a reset of sorts. Councils need to stop taking the cheapest contracts each April that cost them a fortune in additional costs throughout the year.Outside of BT and maybe the post office i think privatisation as been a disaster.
There does need to be a reset of sorts. Councils need to stop taking the cheapest contracts each April that cost them a fortune in additional costs throughout the year.
We also need to fund things properly though. If they’re neglected, the cost of repairing any infrastructure or system only increases the less that is invested in it.
Nah, not sure I agree. Pay may be slightly better but associated benefits like pensions, holidays, sickness etc are better in the public domain for the average worker.Whereas the reality is that most council officers (planning, accounts, execs etc) could earn more in the private sector.
Funding for planners largely comes via fees which had big increases following the white paper in 2017, 20% or 40%.Oh dear. They are off. Planning officers.
View attachment 92640
"This shift is likely to be a direct result of public spending cuts and many of the associated problems for local planning authorities discussed above. Local authorities will both lose the ability to fund the same amount of positions, and struggle to recruit to fill the ones they do have."
Resourcing Public Planning
RTPI research on Resourcing Public Planning shows impacts of cuts and offers solutions to get value from planning.www.rtpi.org.uk
Same with other professions like accountants.
They were the test case. The number of people benefitting run into thousands.
Don’t you think women should get equal pay then?
depends.
If it's a women doing the same job, the same years of experience, the same loyalty years and the same amount of hours then yes. If it's less than the above then no.
Each case is different which makes the whole legal thing a nightmare to deal with
I agree the city centre bits you mention are very nice indeed.It's had issues for years, I Must admit the tipping point of equal pay all seems a tad confusing. It seems like it's in addition to the original settlement & post that settlement bonuses have been given to mainly refuse collectors that haven't to people who were entitled to the same.
It's probably linked to the bin strike a few years ago which went on for ages and made some suburbs seem like the absolute pits.
It's a shame as the city centre in town has honestly improved so so much. A lot of perceptions of Brum as a city are that it is ugly and grey but the part from Chamberlain Square to Centenary Square could rival most Uk cities now in my bias opinion.
The suburbs need improving though (I know all inner cities aren't great) but the sheer amount of fly tipping that exists within a 3-4 mile radius is absolutely disgusting. As more services get stripped back it's only going to get worse.
That’d never work. Whoever replaces Pep won’t be getting the same contract that he’s on now, for the same role.Equal pay for the same job and for the same time worked, any other formulae and it's ridiculous.
That’d never work. Whoever replaces Pep won’t be getting the same contract that he’s on now, for the same role.
If someone is paid less simply because of their gender, then that is obviously wrong. If it’s on experience, less so.
GDP per capita is knowhere near the Scandinavian countries. So no chance of the same level of services. Poor management and no accountability has clearly played a part along with low levels of funding.That to me is the main issue. We want/expect the same kind of services as the Scandinavians (for example) but that would most likely require tax hikes and few seem to be really willing to accept that.
Cuts obviously play a major part but so too does bad management. I worked for a county council many years ago and the wastage at that time was really quite staggering.
Aren’t they banded and they go up the band after a certain amount of time?The problems happened because people doing different jobs wanted the same money as people doing other jobs if I remember correctly.
Normal council jobs with defined job descriptions are paid the same, depending on hours worked etc..etc
Aren’t they banded and they go up the band after a certain amount of time?
I guess we’d have to read the job spec and contracts to know for sure.
Don't they have bands or pay grades that create an equivalence between different jobs? So for example, a bin man and an office clerk are different jobs, but they could both be band C and so in theory paid the same with the same experience?The problems happened because people doing different jobs wanted the same money as people doing other jobs if I remember correctly.
Normal council jobs with defined job descriptions are paid the same, depending on hours worked etc..etc
It was done on a spreadsheet with different weighting factors. A lot of predominantly female roles saw big increases, however most LAs did it around 2004-2009 as part of union driven job evaluation. It was also down to whoever they interviewed in that role making their case in each of the area that were scored, technical knowledge, working conditions, financial responsibility, managerial responsibility etc.Equal pay for the same job and for the same time worked, any other formulae and it's ridiculous.
Don't they have bands or pay grades that create an equivalence between different jobs? So for example, a bin man and an office clerk are different jobs, but they could both be band C and so in theory paid the same with the same experience?
In 2007, before the global financial crash, the UK's GDP per capita was $300 less than the Netherlands (yes, not Scandinavia, but still great public services by all accounts) and basically the same as Germany. In 2009, after the financial crash, we'd slipped to over $4k behind the Netherlands but were actually $1200 ahead of Germany. We're now over $10k less than Germany and $17k less than the Netherlands. It's an astonishing fall from grace. We're now less than half that of Ireland.GDP per capita is knowhere near the Scandinavian countries. So no chance of the same level of services. Poor management and no accountability has clearly played a part along with low levels of funding.
I agree with that. Very few (I never met one but you never know) public sector workers - carrying out jobs that existed in the private sector - did it out of altruism. Generally the jobs were safe, with good conditions, great holidays and excellent pensions. I do recall Birmingham Council had a reputation for paying big salaries to street lighting engineers etc due to shift payments, various allowances, overtime etc that seemed well out of market at the time - they were known to be generous and it was a topic of discussion with various contractors I was working with at time. Was around 10 years ago to be fair.That old chestnut, they do it out of the goodness of their hearts as a favour to us ungrateful tax payers. If they could get more in the private sector, when you start adding in benefits like gold plated pensions, extra holidays, and more generous things like sick pay, and conditions they'd be off. Let's not kid ourselves.
They might not make the cut quality wise either ?