Sorry but there were penty of people calling for the head of MH when we had only lost two matches all season (and drawn 7?)
Now i dont want Mancini gone but he has to take the blame for the very negative style of play and the poor recent results
we played better attacking football under MH....we are better defensively under Mancini....but neither managed to get the balance right.....Mh wasnt given enough time to do so......will Mancini get this time........???? and if he does will he be able to do it??? Im not sure he will as its clearly obvious that he knows only one way to play and that is slow defensive football.
It worked for Mourihnio but will it work for us and ultimately do we want to see this stye of play.....abramovic didnt and that is why in th end despite Mouriihnios success he was still got rid of.
I dont like the style Mancini has brought to the team...i find it dull to watch but if it work then fine...but at the moment every time we have come up against a decent side we have failed miserably (Liverpood, everton, utd not to mention hull and stoke!!!)
the same players were playing better.....we were unlucky not to beat liverpool under MH, and at least we drew against Hull and beat chelski arsenal (twice) and others
but like i said if its succesfful so be it!