By 'real' I guess you mean there weren't incidents of the same magnitude. A life is a life though, and I'm sure you're not naive enough to cover up the fact that the IRA, in its original or provisional form, were carrying out atrocities and guerrilla warfare tactics since 1922; some 50 years before Bloody Sunday.
You’re going down a precarious road if you want to get into the history of the setting up of Northern Ireland.
The Catholic community were left on their tod and it went totally against the grain with Michael Collins who basically had a civil war to fight because Churchill threatened to send the British forces back if he didn’t do something about the Four Courts being occupied by the IRA in Dublin.
Whole communities up north were burned out and nothing done about by the Crown. The IRA was active alright in the 1920’s but to try making out that that the atrocities were originating from them is incorrect or naive, or both. Ulster Unionists were armed to the teeth and basically ethnically cleansing areas of Belfast.
The same thing happened in the border counties and there was mass migrations of communities.
Yes there were terrible atrocities inflicted on Protestant communities too. The Crown just stood by for 50 years and considered it an Irish problem and let the Ulster Unionist do what they wanted.
The Border Commission that was promised never happened.
Ignoring what was going on up North was always going to come back and bite the UK on the arse.
Anyway this discussion deserves a proper dignified discussion and as I said in my other post. Personally I’d prefer to look forward, not much to be gained by looking back.
But don’t blanch over it and don’t be selective and don’t refer to history if you don’t actually know the detail and context.
Ask yourself this.
How would you feel if Thatcher sent troops to the miners strikers’ pickets and fired rubber bullets into the crowd because they were an angry mob.
It wouldn’t happen in England.
It was bad enough the police baton charging them.