sent the mirror this .
Dear Dan. I'm mailing you to complain about Ian Winwood the so called journalist you have on your books. His article on City was biased, sick and just plain spiteful. What puzzles me is what motive does a southern based 'barnsley fan' have to compose such anti CITY lies and general rubbish. Buying success? tell him to look back at man u 's transfer actions during the 26 years it took them to win the prem. league. Aston Villa? They`ve spent millions since billionaire Randy Learner took over. Why doesn't he write some factual stuff for once like why Berbatov has only 2, yeah that's TWO, prem goals all season. Oh my mistake, you can't print stuff like that or you would never be allowed in old trafford again. Yet you continue to bang on week in week out on how Robbie Keane is a terrible buy and on his way out - he has 5 prem goals, by the way. This gets me back to motives. What do you write about, when man u are 3rd and not top of prem, and not playing as well as Fergie and your editor were hoping for?You can't print how great they are doing, so you write what their fans want to hear and what will keep you in favour at old trafford: i.e. City to go down, for 'THE GOOD OF FOOTBALL'.Robbie Keane's lack of goals (I'll point out that it is 5 again)Liverpool board in turmoil, ect ect.Oh and lets not forget all the endless negative stuff written about LEEDS, ARSENAL, CHELSEA and BLACKBURN over the years - ALL utd rivals at some point As I said at the beginning most genuine football fans know about how biased your comic is to utd but even for you this article was a step too far. A football fan.