I see this thread has drawn out the usual excuse makers, trying to be clever by using the old "but you are intolerant because you don't like the BNP and you are seething so you are more anti democratic and stuff and, and, and, and, er something about liberals (even though I am using the term in completely the wrong context - it's not America) and something else about 'lefties' (despite the BNP being the most hard left of any party with an MEP)" line and associated guff.
Now, what this fails to understand is that hardly anyone who is disgusted by the BNP and their $hite would deny them the right to stand. Saying that are all c**ts and pricks is exactly what they want when they whinge about their beloved BNP not getting enough coverage - free speech.
So suck up up, flowers. Most people think the party are c**ts. The BNP claim to be all about free speech. So that's what most people are going to say about them if we stick to their number one whinging line.
Try to be clever as much as you like with the 'seething' lines and 'intolerance' lines. It doesn't work. The BNP is fundementally less tolerant, more seething and more divisive than virtually anyone who criticisise them. It's their ideology. You're on a complete loser from the start with that one.
Keep trying to be clever and trot out copy cat versions of the intellectually bankrupt lines that Griffin likes to come out with to paint him as the persecuted little lamb. He hasn't managed to master them or give them any intellectual credence, instead showing himself up as a complete hypocrite, so his legions of internet and pub bore followers have got little chance of doing so.
How about we start a discussion about this self professed 'anti liberal', 'anti left' party's economic policy, which is something that is straight out of North Korea, if we are trying to be clever. It'll take a totally new theory of economics to explain that one away. Especially if we have to retain this 'right wing supermen' image.
