brooklandsblue2.0 said:
I did not vote BNP as I do not agree with their racist view, as I said IF you look beyond this the party talk a lot of sense on other issues, you can label me what you want, if you think Im a racist go and speak to the folk down at Abduls if BB2.0 is a racist, all the mainly black football team that I coached for two years in Longsight.
What I do fully respect is the BNP's right to exist. What I find rather amusing are the people who claim to be 'oh so liberal' but are now trying to deny the BNP's right to be here, that's called censorship and goes against every fibre of free liberal thinking.....go figure/.
Which bits are these 'a lot of sense' views then? Given that their policy handbook amounts to nothing more thana few catchphrases and the outline of an economic policy from North Korea, I'd love to know.
Is the fact that someone can repeat a soundbite that says "British jobs for British workers" without having the first idea as to how what they propose could be achieved in the real world, what the economic impact would be, how this is modelled, etc?
If the criteria for a politician 'speaking sense' in your world is that they have a couple of soundbites that are catchy but go no further than that and have no way of seriously implementing them without taking us back to a third world economy then I don't know what to say.
Or perhaps the sense they speak is "no to the expenses bastards in the Commons". Wow, revolutionary stuff there", Real sense that no-one else has ever said. A tad hypocritical given that the party is riddled with convicted criminals and the elected officials that they have had in the past have turned out to almost uniformly be out of that depth and an embarrassment to their public positions.
I'm not sure what else this 'sense' could be, given that there's little else of substance (not that the above soundbites constitute substance either) to them.
Perhaps it's the 'imiigration' stance that they take. Well, considering that all the main parties say they are in favour of stringent immigration procedures (you might not believe them, but they say it and you seem to buy into the fairytale policies that the BNP just say) and that UKIP is also for a stop on immigration for five years, then I don't see how their immigration stance is unique either.
Well, I do actually, it's the repatriation bit which is straight from the Nazi handbook, so perhaps it's this that makes them unique in your eyes and is the 'sense' bit. Who knows?
By the way, the two posts earlier in this thread where I pointed out that there was a clown on here who was constantly using the lie about The Black Police Association not allowing white members - a lie that Nick Griffin is very fond of spouting. Well, that happened to be you. Funny that, isn't it. Which is it? Happy to spread lies that people like Griffin spread in order to gain false credence for their nasty views? Or just really easily influenced and will willingly believe and spread any old $hite if it fits in with the prejudices that you want to defend?
Gien the boasting about IQ further up, I presume it has to be the former.
Anyway, I make check back in later to see whether the 'bits that make sense' have been described. Surely, given the IQ boasting, it's not going to consist of a cople of daft soundbites and the completely unworkable comedies of ideas that are apparently supposed to pass for their serious policies?
