Boxing day floods, show us your pictures....:-(

One of the biggest issues is everyone flagging, tarmacking, and concreting over their drives and gardens, if the water could soak into the ground it would take longer to release, now it all goes straight down the street drains into the streams and rivers.

If you imagine how many front gardens have become hard parking spaces, and then work out how much rain falls on say a 12 foot long, 7 foot wide drive area, then multiply that by the number who have done it in towns and villages, in a long lasting spell of rain like the one at the weekend, its billions of gallons of water, that used to soak into the ground, now ending up in the water courses.

Its not just climate change, its land use change too.

If replacing like for like, fine but anything above 5sq m, Planning permission is required for impermeable driveways but porous driveways as you suggest, you do not require PP

How strictly this is adhered to, God only knows but may bite you on the arse when you come to sell and you haven't got the required PP

http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/permission/commonprojects/pavingfrontgarden/
 


Was in the Lake District yesterday. The waters have receded but are still very high. Look at the branch wedged behind the drainpipe on the wall. I estimate the lake at the highest would have been around 15ft higher than normal.
 
One of the problems councils or who ever selling land for houses to developers on known flood plains
Easy solution build on a hill
Cannot understand why people are still surprised when houses built on a riverbank flood
 
One of the biggest issues is everyone flagging, tarmacking, and concreting over their drives and gardens, if the water could soak into the ground it would take longer to release, now it all goes straight down the street drains into the streams and rivers.

If you imagine how many front gardens have become hard parking spaces, and then work out how much rain falls on say a 12 foot long, 7 foot wide drive area, then multiply that by the number who have done it in towns and villages, in a long lasting spell of rain like the one at the weekend, its billions of gallons of water, that used to soak into the ground, now ending up in the water courses.

Its not just climate change, its land use change too.

Oh now you've done it.
Tippler and his gang will be along soon to tell us human actions have no detrimental effect on the world. Prepare to be bombarded with graphs and Patrick Moore quotes.
 
I have just PM'd m7mcfc with an offer of advice, but I would like to clear up the whole 'act of God' thing, as it is often misinterpreted. I work in the insurance industry, but I would rather not say what I do as we have a strict social media policy.

Myth No. 1 - "God does not exist, so how can there be such thing as an act of God?"

As a staunch atheist, I feel the same, however, it is an accepted legal term, and has been used in many court rulings, one being the case of Transco vs. Stockport MBC. In that ruling, Lord Hobhouse defined an act of God as an event:

(i) which involves no human agency
(ii) which is not realistically possible to guard against
(iii) which is due directly and exclusively to natural causes and
(iv) which could not have been prevented by any amount of foresight, plans, and care.


Myth No. 2 - Insurance policies will not pay out for an act of God - this is nonsense. I have never seen an insurance policy with an act of God exclusion, and the Association of British Insurers say it is a myth:

http://www.covermagazine.co.uk/cove...s-disclosure-importance-dispells-act-god-myth

An act of God could still be used in an insurance related scenario though. The Chartered Institute of Loss Adjusters gives this example:

"'Act of God' provides a defence in situations where the cause of loss or damage resulted from a "freak of nature" that could not be anticipated or expected. An example of this could be tiles that are blown from a roof (belonging to Bert) causing damage to a neighbour's car.

Imagine that Bert knew that there were loose tiles and did nothing about it. If a storm within normal expectations blew the tiles off the roof, this would not amount to an Act of God. By contrast, had the roof been fixed and it was sound before the storm and the storm was of unprecedented force such that it could not be imagined or expected, the defence of Act of God may well apply. As you will have noted, the defence relies on something that is beyond expectations, and judgement as to whether the event amounts to an Act of God can be difficult."

Many home insurance policies cover third party liabilities; these will be limited to your legal liability. If you are not legally liable, neither is your insurer. Your policy will tell you exactly what perils you are covered for - if you are covered for flood/storm damage, you are covered. Act of God related purely to third party liability.

That's cleared that up then. Cheers.
 
Apparently dredging does more harm then good as it speeds up the flow of the water. Personally I think no **** knows what's happening or how best to deal with the situation. You only have to look at the carry on in York, lower the flood defences as the pump house is flooded? How about building the new one at the TOP of the hill! You couldn't make this shit up!

Couldn't believe what I was reading yesterday. Letting water in the causes mass destruction because it's the only way to get it back out. How about building something to prevent in coming in the first place.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.