Britain's secret terror force. BBC1 now..

TOFTHELADS said:
He rarely spoke of his time over there, but he got pissed one night and just started talking about it. I had no idea of the sort of shit he went through until then. So huge respect to any of our lads that served.

my old man served there in 321 EOD from 1970 to 1972 as you can imagine he was a busy bloke at the time running around chasing his arse trying to dufuse bombs. He too very very rarely talks about his time there unless we have had more than a few beers. He's had nightmares for years about his time and to be honest still does just not as frequent as the years have gone by.

Sorry, i posted this to blueinsa by mistake.

Thought you may find this interesting if you have not seen it. Brave, brave men.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-jL3drcH_8[/youtube]
 
Whitworth Park said:
mad4city said:
Whitworth Park said:
I really feel sorry for all the people of countries in the World that we fucked up.
Not just us, French, Dutch, Spanish and so on.
I therefore do not see because of conquest that we can claim these places as ours.
The same goes for Gibralter and The Falklands but , what's done is done and until the majority of the people in these places
and NI decide otherwise then it should remain as it is.
Perhaps I should clarify, I only know a couple of Ulstermen who class themselves as Irish, there may be others but I am sure the
majority want to stay British and I said that's how it should remain.
You are probably right as well, perhaps people of the South are a bit two faced.
Asked the question do you want a United Ireland, answer.. Yes.
Do you want the baggage that comes with it.. No.
But I do think it will happen one day, the majority now will become the minority.

Two faced?
The people of the Republic were offered a referendum on the subject, at the time of the Good Friday agreement.
We voted to relinquish the constitutional claim on the six counties and replace it with an aspiration that the country would one day be united.
That was a step forward, made for the good of all concerned, and not an easy step either. It was made at the height of the Celtic Tiger when we (and the world's so-called, top economists) thought there would never be a poor day in Ireland again, too. So financial implications were not an issue.
There is nothing two-faced about a nation voting on an issue at the heart of its constitution. You spout about the democratic wishes of Northern Ireland but you casually insult those of the entire island.
It'd be very interesting to see, if it were put to a vote in the UK, what support there would be for re-uniting Ireland.
Then again, with over 70% of the population, up there, employed by the state, your welcome to it, as far as I'm concerned. (All else aside, you should see what I'm paying in tax, besides supporting the Norn Ironers on top of that!).

Hey, perhaps one day your country might grow up and write its constitution down, rather than making it up as it goes along - and hoodwinking its citizens (subjects?) into thinking that they're doing them a favour by perpetrating that particular, legislative, three card trick.

Calm down.
It was certainly not intended as an insult perhaps I should not have used two faced.
I was merely trying to say that the people of the Republic want a United Ireland but perhaps don't want the shit that would go with it.
At this time anyway.

Sorry. I did kinda go off on a rant there.
And you're right about the attitude in the Republic towards the North, to a certain extent anyway.
A lot of us are fed up with the whole tweedledum & tweedledee approach to politics that they have.
On a more positive note, two middle-aged friends of mine went to Derry & Belfast with their two sons (both in their early 20's), the week before last.
They had to explain to their sons about the Troubles. The lads (who are both in Uni, frighteningly) had a vague notion that there had been some sort of hassle but were blissfully unaware of just how bad it was. Still less could they give a shite when it was told to them.
Maybe there's some hope if all of today's kids feel that way.
Anyway, apologies again for jumping down your throat like I did. I was out of order.
 
mad4city said:
Balti said:
It was war

Innocents die in war but usually accidemtally

In this case the IR purposely targeted innocent people including old men and children by blowing them up usually

i don't believe that the british government stooped to that same low level even if of course innocent people suffered as they always do in war (but nowhere near as much as the IRA made them suffer of course)

It wasn't a war though. At least not as far as your government is concerned. The hunger strikes were all about the IRA wanting to be accorded prisoner of war status. The UK never granted it.

You are right,the hunger strikes were about POW status, but they became more than that. Bobby Sands was democratically elected as an MP whilst on hunger strike. Here are a few of his words:

“I believe I am but another of those wretched Irishmen born of a risen generation with a deeply rooted and unquenchable desire for freedom. I am dying not just to attempt to end the barbarity of H-Block, or to gain the rightful recognition of a political prisoner, but primarily because what is lost in here is lost for the Republic and those wretched oppressed whom I am deeply proud to know as the ‘risen people’.”

They will not criminalise us, rob us of our true identity, steal our individualism, depoliticise us, churn us out as systemised, institutionalised, decent law-abiding robots. Never will they label our liberation struggle as criminal.”



Interesting that Peter Robinson quoted Bobby sands just yesterday in his speech to the DUP conference. He called his vision narrow. In 2013, I think he is right.
 
mammutly said:
mad4city said:
Balti said:
It was war

Innocents die in war but usually accidemtally

In this case the IR purposely targeted innocent people including old men and children by blowing them up usually

i don't believe that the british government stooped to that same low level even if of course innocent people suffered as they always do in war (but nowhere near as much as the IRA made them suffer of course)

It wasn't a war though. At least not as far as your government is concerned. The hunger strikes were all about the IRA wanting to be accorded prisoner of war status. The UK never granted it.

You are right,the hunger strikes were about POW status, but they became more than that. Bobby Sands was democratically elected as an MP whilst on hunger strike. Here are a few of his words:

“I believe I am but another of those wretched Irishmen born of a risen generation with a deeply rooted and unquenchable desire for freedom. I am dying not just to attempt to end the barbarity of H-Block, or to gain the rightful recognition of a political prisoner, but primarily because what is lost in here is lost for the Republic and those wretched oppressed whom I am deeply proud to know as the ‘risen people’.”

They will not criminalise us, rob us of our true identity, steal our individualism, depoliticise us, churn us out as systemised, institutionalised, decent law-abiding robots. Never will they label our liberation struggle as criminal.”



Interesting that Peter Robinson quoted Bobby sands just yesterday in his speech to the DUP conference. He called his vision narrow. In 2013, I think he is right.
I'm sure he just fancied a chicken curry
 
i kne albert davy said:
mammutly said:
mad4city said:
It wasn't a war though. At least not as far as your government is concerned. The hunger strikes were all about the IRA wanting to be accorded prisoner of war status. The UK never granted it.

You are right,the hunger strikes were about POW status, but they became more than that. Bobby Sands was democratically elected as an MP whilst on hunger strike. Here are a few of his words:

“I believe I am but another of those wretched Irishmen born of a risen generation with a deeply rooted and unquenchable desire for freedom. I am dying not just to attempt to end the barbarity of H-Block, or to gain the rightful recognition of a political prisoner, but primarily because what is lost in here is lost for the Republic and those wretched oppressed whom I am deeply proud to know as the ‘risen people’.”

They will not criminalise us, rob us of our true identity, steal our individualism, depoliticise us, churn us out as systemised, institutionalised, decent law-abiding robots. Never will they label our liberation struggle as criminal.”



Interesting that Peter Robinson quoted Bobby sands just yesterday in his speech to the DUP conference. He called his vision narrow. In 2013, I think he is right.
I'm sure he just fancied a chicken curry

<a class="postlink" href="http://audioboo.fm/boos/562460-sammy-wilson-s-tasteless-joke-about-long-creche-at-sf-s-ard-fheis" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://audioboo.fm/boos/562460-sammy-wi ... -ard-fheis</a>
 
mammutly said:
i kne albert davy said:
mammutly said:
You are right,the hunger strikes were about POW status, but they became more than that. Bobby Sands was democratically elected as an MP whilst on hunger strike. Here are a few of his words:

“I believe I am but another of those wretched Irishmen born of a risen generation with a deeply rooted and unquenchable desire for freedom. I am dying not just to attempt to end the barbarity of H-Block, or to gain the rightful recognition of a political prisoner, but primarily because what is lost in here is lost for the Republic and those wretched oppressed whom I am deeply proud to know as the ‘risen people’.”

They will not criminalise us, rob us of our true identity, steal our individualism, depoliticise us, churn us out as systemised, institutionalised, decent law-abiding robots. Never will they label our liberation struggle as criminal.”



Interesting that Peter Robinson quoted Bobby sands just yesterday in his speech to the DUP conference. He called his vision narrow. In 2013, I think he is right.
I'm sure he just fancied a chicken curry

<a class="postlink" href="http://audioboo.fm/boos/562460-sammy-wilson-s-tasteless-joke-about-long-creche-at-sf-s-ard-fheis" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://audioboo.fm/boos/562460-sammy-wi ... -ard-fheis</a>
bit late in the night for links as Ive been on pre tottingham game beer night sorry
 
mad4city said:
Balti said:
It was war

Innocents die in war but usually accidemtally

In this case the IR purposely targeted innocent people including old men and children by blowing them up usually

i don't believe that the british government stooped to that same low level even if of course innocent people suffered as they always do in war (but nowhere near as much as the IRA made them suffer of course)

It wasn't a war though. At least not as far as your government is concerned. The hunger strikes were all about the IRA wanting to be accorded prisoner of war status. The UK never granted it.

Excellent point.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.