British gas behaviour

urban genie

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 May 2008
Messages
32,832
What would BG's detractors suggest they do?
They are in a terrible mess, losing money hand over fist due, largely, to massively increased competition.
Plus gas is rapidly becoming yesterday's source of energy.
In short, the company is dying. Upon its demise all its employees become unemployed, the measures they have promoted are intended to breathe a little life back into it - giving it time to pivot?
Clearly, there has been some terrible negotiations at play (on both sides) but they can't let things go.
 
What would BG's detractors suggest they do?
They are in a terrible mess, losing money hand over fist due, largely, to massively increased competition.
Plus gas is rapidly becoming yesterday's source of energy.
In short, the company is dying. Upon its demise all its employees become unemployed, the measures they have promoted are intended to breathe a little life back into it - giving it time to pivot?
Clearly, there has been some terrible negotiations at play (on both sides) but they can't let things go.

So centrica say this business sof theirs need reform and the best way is a 15% pay cut for the engineers, decided only weeks after its chief executive awarded himself a 44%pay rise and over £700000 bonus.

A dying gas industry can pivot, but what will happen is those at the top will take what they can at the expense of those at the bottom.

This happened nearly 30 years ago with the likes of GEC and is still going on while some doff their caps and say, "well what can you do"
 
Last edited:
What would BG's detractors suggest they do?
They are in a terrible mess, losing money hand over fist due, largely, to massively increased competition.
Plus gas is rapidly becoming yesterday's source of energy.
In short, the company is dying. Upon its demise all its employees become unemployed, the measures they have promoted are intended to breathe a little life back into it - giving it time to pivot?
Clearly, there has been some terrible negotiations at play (on both sides) but they can't let things go.
I'm not sure that the best way to breathe life back into a company is to radically undermine the workforce it wholly relies upon to deliver its's service.

It could have engaged in meaningful consultation with unions and workforce to indentify solutions and might have looked tom for instance, a VS scheme or some form of compensation scheme for staff having to work to a new contract,

Perhaps if BG invested more in improving the product they would have a bigger market.

It certainly seems they lacked some decent HR advice - any ideas where they could hvae gote better advice from? :)
 
What would BG's detractors suggest they do?
They are in a terrible mess, losing money hand over fist due, largely, to massively increased competition.
Plus gas is rapidly becoming yesterday's source of energy.
In short, the company is dying. Upon its demise all its employees become unemployed, the measures they have promoted are intended to breathe a little life back into it - giving it time to pivot?
Clearly, there has been some terrible negotiations at play (on both sides) but they can't let things go.

cut shareholder dividends and freeze or cut boardroom pay?

No business that airs its dirty linen in public like this deserves to succeed. Sacking customer facing staff - particularly mission critical staff - should be seen as corporate suicide. every delayed, late and missed appointment will be blamed on this move - there will be bad press and probably sanctions from the regulator when their service delivery slips and rightly so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
I'm not sure that the best way to breathe life back into a company is to radically undermine the workforce it wholly relies upon to deliver its's service.

It could have engaged in meaningful consultation with unions and workforce to indentify solutions and might have looked tom for instance, a VS scheme or some form of compensation scheme for staff having to work to a new contract,

Perhaps if BG invested more in improving the product they would have a bigger market.

It certainly seems they lacked some decent HR advice - any ideas where they could hvae gote better advice from? :)
They’re also making very healthy profits at the minute from my understanding.
 
cut shareholder dividends and freeze or cut boardroom pay?

No business that airs its dirty linen in public like this deserves to succeed. Sacking customer facing staff - particularly mission critical staff - should be seen as corporate suicide. every delayed, late and missed appointment will be blamed on this move - there will be bad press and probably sanctions from the regulator when their service delivery slips and rightly so.


They have already cancelled boiler instalments and new home service contracts as they will not have the number of engineers needed to supply the customer needs.

If ever a business has cut off it's nose etc it is this move, under most capatist thinking a business model as this would be consodered stupid.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.