hilts
Well-Known Member
So what you two are suggesting is that personal attacks and unfounded accusations are unacceptable despite a person in perceived power committing them and we should have evidence and consistency for our moral frameworks rather than accepting authoritative statements of correctness due to their position?
Yeah you're right. I agree completely.
No I'm just saying you were wrong and you wouldn't admit it as per usual, call me what you want it bothers me not, calling me a idiot says a lot more about you than it does me, if you find it hard to accept that someone who isn't getting there knickers in twist over dead terrorists must be a Wum then that's your look out
You may think you have me Sussed but you Are wrong which is becoming a trait with you
Self awareness doesn't come easy to some, I don't hold it against you