Brown Envelopes.......

But France is doing exactly that - restricting the options for criminals. And they are doing it for good of bookmakers as they are done hard by such tactics so don't understand why would bookmakers be angry with it.. unless I haven't understood what you wanted to say as it happens sometimes with my English.
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.insidefutbol.com/2012/10/31/zlatan-ibrahimovic-and-mario-balotellis-agent-blasts-uefa-for-double-standards-on-financial-fair-play/71855/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.insidefutbol.com/2012/10/31/ ... lay/71855/</a>?
 
For those who are unsure of how this works & how these syndicates operate I would recommend the following book - it was an eye opener for me & I couldn't put it down.

http://www.howtofixasoccergame.com/

One of the authors blogs on the same site:
I know, I know – you are sitting there reading reports of Italian national team players being arrested at their training camps: the coach of Juventus being taken in for questioning mere weeks after winning the national championship: dozens of other players being arrested – and you think, ‘There is no way that it can get worse! My goodness if even a tenth of these allegations are true. This is awful.’ However, all these stories are superficial details of a major theme that has emerged.

Listen up and listen well. I have said this before. I have been warning about this issue for seven years and most sports officials and journalists have deliberately ignored the message, so listen carefully this time and then take action.

We are speaking about an industrial-system of corruption in European football. This is no longer about allegations of key players and officials being involved in fixing, but a business model of corruption that is enveloping the sport.

Why the strong words?

First, over half the professional teams in Italy are now under investigation for corruption. Those are the teams, not individual players that are being questioned by police. If such a large number of teams is alleged to have been involved, it becomes part of an accepted business model to be corrupt. It is no longer about sensational details, but an informal system of governance.

Second, take a look at the Black Book by the umbrella organization of players’ unions in Europe – FIFPro. In January of 2012, they produced a very good survey of over three-thousand of their members (current European football players). More than ten percent of their members reported direct involvement in match-fixing, they had either fixed themselves or had been approached directly to fix. Another twenty-three percent of their members knew of fixing going on their leagues. The authors of the report write they think these numbers are an under-estimation of the amount of fixing going on as many teams that were rumoured to be corrupt refused to allow their players to take part in the survey.
With these kinds of numbers we are speaking of a business model – a professionalization of corruption. The allegation at the centre of all these scandals is that club officials and senior players are sitting down and choosing which games to win and which games to lose based on their own balance sheets and pension plans. They will plan to win twenty games a season, and lose ten. Because they have the certainty in losing – they can make more money by losing those games then they can by winning all the rest.

Who is fixing the Italian league?

According to the police documents that I am reading, it is the same group of Asian match-brokers and fixers that I wrote about in The Fix. They allied with a gang of Balkan semi-criminals who were their ‘runners’ and they entered into alliances with players, coaches and team officials.

I wrote about these guys and their methods. I named names. I showed how they went about their business. This scandal should not be a surprise to any sports official.

Is there any hope?

Yes, thank goodness for the Italian police and state prosecutors. Unlike their sports officials they have actually taken the problem seriously and are doing something about it. Hopefully, they can save Italian and European football before all credibility is gone.
If you don't believe there is corruption in the PL then you really are living on another planet.
 
Good point. A quick search brings up this.


A survey conducted by Fifpro, the worldwide union of football players, has brought to light that a stunning 23.6 per cent of players in Eastern and Southern Europe are aware of match-fixing in their league. In Russia, hosts of the 2018 World Cup, this percentage even rises to 43.5.

The BBC reveals that according to the questionnaire 11.9 % of the players were approached to influence the outcome of a game, with a peak figure of 30.3 % of the questioned players in Greece.

More than four out of every 10 (41,1 %) questioned players did not have their wages paid in time at one point, and Fifpro director Anthony Higgins feels there is a link between non-payment and match-fixing.

"These are very worrying results. A massive wake-up call for football, including Western Europe. In the east, players regularly discover they are not paid by their clubs and then find themselves being targeted by corrupt influences. They are vulnerable," Higgins said to BBC.

The football world has been rocked by match-fixing scandals in Italy and Turkey in recent years, with investigations ongoing in both countries.


And this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16923742
 
Has this been mentioned yet?

French betting authority investigates Lyon's Champions League win

The Guardian, Thursday 8 December 2011 21.09 GMT

Mark Clattenburg has emerged as the key figure in Uefa's investigations of Dinamo Zagreb's extraordinary 7-1 home defeat by Lyon in the Champions League on Wednesday night.

Uefa is waiting for the Premier League referee's report into the controversial match, during which his fellow Englishmen Mike Mullarkey and Peter Kirkup were running the lines. Lee Probert, another elite English referee, was fourth official, and Kevin Friend and Andre Marriner were the by-line assistants. The conclusions in Clattenburg's report will influence whether Uefa takes its inquiries into the events any further after the result permitted the French team to progress to the last 16 of the competition at the expense of Ajax.

Dinamo had been down to 10 men after Clattenburg sent off Jerko Leko 28 minutes into the game. What made the result all the more remarkable was that at the end of normal time in the first half the Croatian side had been 1-0 up.

The French Autorité de Régulation des Jeux en Ligne (Arjel) on Thursday carried out checks to establish if any suspicious betting took place around the match but reported that it found nothing out of the ordinary in the total amount gambled online with French operators, the number of bets, their spread, or in how odds evolved during the game.

Uefa's betting fraud detection system (BFDS), which monitors betting patterns in every match in its competitions, has been consulted for evidence of any irregular betting patterns around the match. However, Uefa indicated on Thursday afternoon that it had found no instances to justify an inquiry on betting grounds. Its president, Michel Platini, said he had "no doubts whatsoever about the integrity of the match or the competition".

A spokeswoman for Uefa said: "We look at every match automatically through the BFDS system then it becomes another matter if anything is found," said a spokeswoman for Uefa.

"We always also look at the reports from officials because they are briefed on any issues relating to match fixing. If there's anything suspicious – which is rare – it will be mentioned by them. But we are still waiting on those reports."

Lyon confirmed Arjel is undertaking inquiries in a statement that said: "Olympique Lyonnais are aware of the checks being conducted this morning by Arjel, which are completely in tune with the procedures of the governing body for online betting.

"The club totally approves of this action that is undertaken whenever a sporting result is considered unusual and we regret that comments have not been confined to the sporting aspect of an incredible achievement both for Olympique Lyonnais and French football as a whole."

The Ajax coach, Frank de Boer, said Uefa should investigate the Lyon match if it was suspected anything unusual had gone on. "If there was something unusual, Uefa should investigate what happened in Zagreb," De Boer was quoted as saying by ESPN Soccernet.

Bernard Lacombe, Lyon's sporting director, offered a more emotional perspective on the inquiries. "It's total rubbish, people should stop saying such things," he said. "Did they open an investigation at half-time when it was 1-1? I don't give a damn what the Ajax manager says. Apparently we are also responsible for the refereeing of the match in Amsterdam."

Dinamo, who have parted company with their coach, Krunoslav Jurcic, also issued angry denials of any wrongdoing in the game. "It is tendentious, outrageous and malicious to declare the recent Champions League match [between] Dinamo [and] Lyon in Maksimir suspicious," the club said. "Dinamo again strongly condemns all insinuations in the media, both foreign, and domestic, of favouring any results. If the insinuations in the media continue, GNK Dinamo will take all legal measures to protect their rights."

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/dec/08/betting-authority-lyon-champions-league" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011 ... ons-league</a>
 
REPORTAGE | Football & Sport

Arsenal Fans: Here’s The Evidence Of The Manchester United Referee ConspiraBy Nadim Bedran

Posted: 1 November 2012
Tags: Arsenal, Football, Manchester United Referee Conspiracy


Wonder why referees who give United bad decisions never repeat the trick? It's because they get taught a heavy lesson from Fergie, The FA & PGMOB. The conspiracy unravels within....

This does not make for a comforting read for Arsenal fans ahead of this Saturday’s meeting with Manchester United…

After I wrote my last piece, on Manchester United’s relationship with the FA, I was taken aback by the response I had. I suggest to people who haven’t read it to jump to that post now as it gives a lot of background on what we will look at in this article.

As stated in my previous post, the fortunes of the institutions surrounding football in the UK will be negatively hit should any proof of corruption come out. It is naturally in their interest not to investigate the matter. In fact, the managers that have come out and questioned the refereeing selection process (Rafa Benitez, Andre Villas Boas) have been turned into laughing stocks by the English press corps.

So, investigate some more I did. And some of the stuff I found out surprised even me.

During United’s title winning 2010/11 season, they only lost 4 league games. I looked at who refereed those games and how long they then spent without being assigned Manchester United games as well their subsequent trend of behavior towards United.

The second game United lost was away to Chelsea. Martin Atkinson was the referee then and some of his decisions incurred the wrath of Alex Ferguson. Atkinson was not given another United game to referee for an ENTIRE YEAR.

Michael Oliver took charge of their first defeat, the February 2011 2-1 loss at Wolves. He was not given another Manchester United game to referee until December 2011. Since then, Oliver has had 2 United games.

United have won both, with Oliver refusing to give a clear Fulham penalty in the 1-0 United win late last season at Old Trafford; a game came right at the end of the title race. A few weeks ago, Oliver gave United a penalty for a shocking dive by Danny Welbeck in the home win against Wigan.

The second game United lost was away to Chelsea. Martin Atkinson was the referee then and some of his decisions incurred the wrath of Alex Ferguson. Atkinson was not given another United game to referee for an ENTIRE YEAR.

Atkinson was further punished with his decisions that went against United that day. He was not given a single Premier League game to referee for a full month. Even worse, he was subsequently given 3 lower league games to referee that season- when he’d previously not officiated a single one that campaign.

It seems that Atkinson was given a clear message that day.

Giving United penalties in the very next game you referee for them after having been criticized is a trend we’ll soon notice.

The 3rd United loss came at Anfield, where a Dirk Kuyt hat trick secured a 3-1 home win. The referee that day was Phil Dowd. He was criticized by Ferguson for not sending Jamie Carragher off. In the very next United game Dowd refereed, he gave them a penalty which secured a 1-1 draw at Blackburn and their 19th league title.

Giving United penalties in the very next game you referee for them after having been criticized is a trend we’ll soon notice.

The final United loss of the 2010/11 season came at the Emirates, where Chris Foy refereed a 1-0 Arsenal win. It will come to no surprise to people to know that Foy was subsequently not assigned a United league game for, again, AN ENTIRE YEAR.

He did however referee 2 United games in the cups during that time. The first was in the Carling Cup against Crystal Palace. He awarded United a penalty. The second was at Manchester City in the FA Cup. United got a penalty and Vincent Kompany was sent off early in the game.

To resume, we’ve just analyzed what happened to the 4 referees that officiated United’s 4 league losses in the 2010/11 season. 2 of them were not given any more United league games for a full year (Atkinson and Foy), a third for 9 months (Oliver). 2 of those referees gave United penalties in the very next game (Foy and Dowd) they took charge of and one refused to give a blatant one to the opponents (Oliver). Martin Atkinson, was not given Premier League games to officiate for an entire month and assigned to 3 lower league games.

When Halsey gave WBA a debatable penalty in the 1-1 draw at Old Trafford in May 2005 it was his 5th United game that season. He then also went an ENTIRE YEAR without being given any United games to referee. From 5 games in a season to none for a year…

I also looked at Mike Jones after prompting from the comments board. Jones refereed the 1-1 home draw with Newcastle last season and falsely awarded Demba Ba a penalty.

Subsequently, Jones was not given a single football game, at ANY level, to referee for an entire month. The next United game he was handed came a few months later, the 2-0 home win against Stoke which saw… You guessed it: 2 penalties awarded to Manchester United which, according to reports, were “very soft”.

How about Mark Halsey? Well, when he gave WBA a debatable penalty in the 1-1 draw at Old Trafford in May 2005 it was his 5th United game that season. He then also went an ENTIRE YEAR without being given any United games to referee. From 5 games in a season to none for a year. His record since then? He’s refereed 11 Man Utd games which have seen 11 United wins: the latest coming at Anfield, where 3 controversial decisions went the away team’s way.

In terms of trends, considering what we discovered about Alan Wiley and Mark Clattenburg (whose record with no United games to referee now stands at 36 league games since he took charge of the 6-1 home loss to City), there’s enough to make you wonder what exactly is going on in the referee selection process. It also ties in perfectly with ex referee Jeff Winter’s comments about The FA being reticent to assign United games to referees Ferguson has criticized in the past.

I don’t blame the referees…The people I blame are the ones that are letting this happen

The whole world revolves around incentives and punishment. From a young age, kids are brought up that way. Positive and negative reinforcement are at the very core of child psychology. You can’t blame people who are well aware of the punishment awaiting them (through the form of demotionsand suspension from future United games) if they’d rather go for the safe option of keeping Ferguson happy.

I don’t blame the referees.

The people I blame are the ones that are letting this happen. The media who have not uttered a peep or written a single article about this for 2 decades. The FA who run the game in this country and have allowed this situation to fester. The clubs who see no issue with having David Gill, United’s CEO, on the board of the FA. And of course, the PGMOB: the people who regulate officiating in England

The person at the head of the PGMOB and who is in charge of selecting which referee gets handed which game is Mike Riley, an ex professional referee who is most famous for giving a penalty for a clear dive by Wayne Rooney in the 2004 Man United 2-0 win against Arsenal which ended the Gunners 49 game unbeaten streak.

Riley was accused of pro United favoritism throughout his career. For younger readers, he’s my generation’s Howard Webb.

Riley’s bias was so suspected than when was awarded the Everton vs Man Utd FA Cup semi final to officiate in 2009, David Moyes actually called for an investigation on whether Riley was a United supporter. This is the man who now decides which premier league games to assign to referee

According to the Guardian’s research, which goes to back to the beginning of the 1997-98 season until 2004, “Riley refereed 23 United games in all competitions and gave 12 penalties for United in that time, but only three against them. And he has sent off five of United’s opponents.

At Old Trafford, Riley’s record is weighted even more heavily in favor of United: He gave 10 penalties in the 14 games he officiated to the home side, Manchester United.”

Riley’s bias was so suspected than when was awarded the Everton vs Man Utd FA Cup semi final to officiate in 2009, David Moyes actually called for an investigation on whether Riley was a United supporter.

This is the man who now decides which premier league games to assign to referees.

Add that to everything we’ve found out: the year long waits for referees who take charge of United losses to be given another United game to officiate, the penalties that are given to United in said referees next United games, the punishment for making mistakes that cost United points (Atkinson’s month long suspension from premier league games, Jones’ 1 month suspension from ALL PROFESSIONAL games), the comments from ex referee Jeff Winter (see my previous post), the fact that 18% of Howard Webb’s career penalties have gone to Manchester United,the retirement of Alain Wiley after being called unfit by Alex Ferguson and, of course, the presence of David Gill inside the FA and surely there’s enough there for some investigative journalist in the UK to actually look more into this.

Why did Foy’s errors on Saturday lead to his demotion to the lowest professional league in England while Webb’s and Jones’ mistakes didn’t cost them?
If only to put the millions of football fans’ across the world’s minds at ease.
Because we could all be wrong and all of this may just be a set of freakish coincidences. Maybe English football is squeaky clean like they make us believe and the referee selection process is completely unbiased.

Maybe we’re just paranoid…

Or maybe not… Chris Foy failed to give Manchester United a penalty in their 3-2 loss to Spurs last month. The PGMOB did not handed Foy a Premier League game to referee the next weekend: instead, officiated in League 2 for the first time in more than 4 years.

Mike Jones meanwhile, who missed a blatant penalty on Luis Suarez at Norwich the same weekend, took charge of West Brom vs QPR in the Premier League. Finally, Howard Webb (who sent off Jordi Gomez on Saturday; a red card today rescinded by the FA) took charge of Newcastle’s home game against Manchester United.

Why did Foy’s errors on last month lead to his demotion to the lowest professional league in England while Webb’s and Jones’ mistakes didn’t cost them?
I guess we all know the answer to that question…

This article originally appeared on The Dim In Beirut You can follow Nadim on twitter@dimmybad
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.