Blue Theatre
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,741
Keown generally gives City a lot of credit (as you'd expect bearing in mind how good we are) but today we were playing his beloved Arsenal.
PR37 got one (Norwich away ?) With far less contact than today.The worst bit for me was when Jesus was held in the penalty area and the commentators said it was fine. No big inquiry afterwards about why VAR did not review it. It looked like a penalty to me. If it was an Arsenal player fouled in a similar manner would the commentators have said in was fine? Would Jake Humphrey have lead a witch hunt into VAR inconsistency?
The commentary is as much guilty of inconsistencies as VAR.
Had iptv over a year now never miss a game and I’m either there or at home but sky and bt don’t get a penny from me! Get it done blue you won’t regret it!That's made my decision to bin BT sport. If I miss it I'll get a firestick and IPTV but not another penny is going towards their biased c***s in the commentary box. All 3 were a disgrace today.
The worst bit for me was when Jesus was held in the penalty area and the commentators said it was fine. No big inquiry afterwards about why VAR did not review it. It looked like a penalty to me. If it was an Arsenal player fouled in a similar manner would the commentators have said in was fine? Would Jake Humphrey have lead a witch hunt into VAR inconsistency?
The commentary is as much guilty of inconsistencies as VAR.
Spot on! When they were screaming about Laportes raised arm. I thought Eric you daft bastard! Then they showed the replay and low and behold the dickheads had just made it up! Absolutely unbelievable!Summed it up perfectly for me when they were shouting that Laporte raised his arms to Martinelli in the second half.
Lambasting the decision for VAR to not take a look, then replay showed that there were no arms raised at all and they shut up very quickly. Bizarre.
Well there were 3 TV angles of the VAR check - 2 looked like Eddie got the ball first, 1 looked like Eddie clipped his foot first, BT go with the outlier.PR37 got one (Norwich away ?) With far less contact than today.
No replay shown at half time, nothing.
As for BT and var, the reason var didn't ask the referee do go to the monitor for Eddie's 'foul' is because they agreed with the ref. Why BT idiots kept saying otherwise shows how biased they are
Bang on the money. Persistent claims by the BT coverage with regard to inconsistency in the use of VAR, yet a complete lack of self awareness with regard to their own obvious bias.The worst bit for me was when Jesus was held in the penalty area and the commentators said it was fine. No big inquiry afterwards about why VAR did not review it. It looked like a penalty to me. If it was an Arsenal player fouled in a similar manner would the commentators have said in was fine? Would Jake Humphrey have lead a witch hunt into VAR inconsistency?
The commentary is as much guilty of inconsistencies as VAR.
Less contact and the ball 40 ft above his head. Today's ball was going straight to Jesus and it was just a rugby tackle. 100% penaltyPR37 got one (Norwich away ?) With far less contact than today.
No replay shown at half time, nothing.
As for BT and var, the reason var didn't ask the referee do go to the monitor for Eddie's 'foul' is because they agreed with the ref. Why BT idiots kept saying otherwise shows how biased they are
Doesn't dazn have all the prem games in some countries? Might be worth looking intoOut of interest does anyone based in the UK subscribe to a foreign football channel that can get the PL and CL coverage? Cant handle BT or SKY any longer.