Bulger Murderer sent back to clink

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
scottyboi said:
Damocles said:
You've got your inference wrong. Not all psychos are paedos, all paedos are psychos.

Wasnt he found stripped naked and shit, I dont even want to go into it because it makes me feel sick.

No, he was brutally beaten but nothing sexual was involved.
 
thought i'd jump in on the thread! i dont remember anything about batteries,but then again i bet a hell of a lot didnt go public, jack straw has to come clean on this one and this guy has to be prosecuted under his real name

RIP JB
 
It's a myth:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/bulger.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/bulger.asp</a>

With only one exception (the batteries in the victim's anus - they went into his mouth) the details of the crime as outlined in the e-mail are accurate.
 
Banned Tosspot said:
BlueDean said:
They werent found in his mouth
The batteries in his anus is a myth.

Not from the report I read. Im guessing theres only 2 people who really knew what went on tho and they wouldnt say anything at the time and I doubt they will ever admit to the real reasons behind why they did what they did and what really happened

But this coming out since, perhaps shows one of the real reasons
 
as if systematically beating and torturing the kid wasn't bad enough, the coroner stated he was NOT dead when they left him, but died due to the train cutting him in half. the batteries were found nearby, along with an iron bar used to beat him, and it is a FACT, there was a lot of blood found on his underwear. why was he naked from the waist down, if nothing sexual was involved? We can all draw our own conclusions..... i just wish i could have 5 mins with either or both of them.
 
alextrueblue said:
as if systematically beating and torturing the kid wasn't bad enough, the coroner stated he was NOT dead when they left him, but died due to the train cutting him in half. the batteries were found nearby, along with an iron bar used to beat him, and it is a FACT, there was a lot of blood found on his underwear. why was he naked from the waist down, if nothing sexual was involved? We can all draw our own conclusions..... i just wish i could have 5 mins with either or both of them.

You sure about that ?
 
I just read somewhere (can't remember where, maybe Wikipedia) that he died before the train ran over him. The coroner said they couldn't pin point which blow/injury killed him, suggesting it was horrific and violent. But he died before the train cut him in half. Horrible.
 
The battery incident is neither here or there, though the report i read in 2001 insinuated sexual deviancy towards james.
Either way fact/fiction...... these two sick fucks were given a life they weren't entitled to.
 
vincent said:
alextrueblue said:
as if systematically beating and torturing the kid wasn't bad enough, the coroner stated he was NOT dead when they left him, but died due to the train cutting him in half. the batteries were found nearby, along with an iron bar used to beat him, and it is a FACT, there was a lot of blood found on his underwear. why was he naked from the waist down, if nothing sexual was involved? We can all draw our own conclusions..... i just wish i could have 5 mins with either or both of them.

You sure about that ?

its true about cutting in half but i thought he died before that?

from wiki(so dont know if true) "A forensic pathologist testified that he had died before he was struck by the train"
 
zin Zimmer and a few others I totally agree, these little fucks gave up all rights to a normal when they committed this PRE-PLANNED act.

Mammutly and brooklands....... you appal me.
At least BB02 had the sense to stay out of the resulting thread after a couple of distasteful comments.
 
Bilboblue said:
zin Zimmer and a few others I totally agree, these little fucks gave up all rights to a normal when they committed this PRE-PLANNED act.

Mammutly and brooklands....... you appal me.
At least BB02 had the sense to stay out of the resulting thread after a couple of distasteful comments.

what did they say?
 
I think the point, is that he wasn't exactly a paedophile before he went inside. Those lads were many things, but that isn't one of them. We can be 100% sure that they weren't paedophiles, simply because they shown during the Bulger murder that they had no switch that would stop them from doing anything that they wanted to. If they were paedophiles, they would have raped a kid back then. Since they didn't, it is logical to assume that Venables was made into a paedophile whilst inside.

I wouldn't be surprised considering he would have been on a protection wing inside, which is the domain of the paedos, thus associated with them regularly.

Hell, perhaps that is all wrong, and he just had the urge to look at kids being raped one day, I don't know. Who knows what goes on in a mind like his?
 
Damocles said:
I wouldn't be surprised considering he would have been on a protection wing inside, which is the domain of the paedos, thus associated with them regularly.

I've no idea how these things work but I'd seriously doubt that they'd chuck a kid in with all the paedo's
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Damocles said:
I wouldn't be surprised considering he would have been on a protection wing inside, which is the domain of the paedos, thus associated with them regularly.

I've no idea how these things work but I'd seriously doubt that they'd chuck a kid in with all the paedo's

he wasn't.
he was in 'youth institutions'
Never served a day in an adult prison until now
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top