Were you playing for Burnley tonight then?? I’m confused ??Played on by Mee knee. Those are the rules. Doesn't make them right but onside
And don’t forget the screen wasn’t even working!Comfortable win for City.
No idea how VAR didn't award a penalty for the hack on Gab in the box 2nd half, what is going on with pens...Utd get them for blatant dives and we don't get them for blatant kicks. The Referees Association has some feckin explaining to do. Same teams getting the pens every bloody week.
Anyway, back to City.
Strong at the back again although Ederson lost the plot once or twice near the end.
Gundo ran things and looks our most dangerous player.
Raz was hit & miss (again)
Good performance from Mahrez
Rodri very good (again)
Come on Brighton.
I did.Didn’t think Jesus’s was a penalty.
right . he should’ve got red card for getting kicked.Didn’t think Jesus’s was a penalty.
I meant Mee played him onside. Marginally. The rule should be daylight between the boots if each player and no need for graphs then.We’re you playing for Burnley tonight then?? I’m confused ??
All this about Ederson should have been sent off
unless I totally misunderstood what was said in the aftermath of the luiz red and martial dive.. even if it was denying a goal scoring opportunity.. which is stretching it a lot.. he wouldn’t have been sent off anyway cos he made an attempt to get the ball?
Normally my attempts at humour are better received than this WG .. I shall put it down to lockdown depression..I meant Mee played him onside. Marginally. The rule should be daylight between the boots if each player and no need for graphs then.
No worries mateNormally my attempts at humour are better received than this WG .. I shall put it down to lockdown depression..
Peter Walton convinced nobody but himself that VAR made the correct decision about the Jesus penalty. His compelling argument was that firstly the contact was incidental and that secondly the VAR official is entitled to make subjective decisions. Therefore check complete and on with the game.
At least he didn't claim it was an optical illusion like he did to justify a decision in favour of man u once.
The man has no shame. He must be a psychopath or something.
What was his reasoning for it not being a penPeter Walton trying to explain why it's not a penalty now. He really is a a clown.
Perhaps we may get out of second gear soon in that case.Duly dispatched. Tough run now!
A talking dummy.Peter Walton is the most pointless pundit on TV. The man is stealing a living.