Bury Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 77198
  • Start date
paska said:
I understand all that, which is an awful situation and really beggars belief considering these are two groups united by their love for the defunct local team, which wasn’t sank by either of them but rather by dodgy and incompetent investors.

What I don’t understand is the position that Bury FC thinks that Bury AFC wants to take over rather than merge. That doesn’t make much sense. What distinction are BFC making that results in that conclusion? Either it’s a completely empty platitude designed to stoke the already hot flames, or if it isn’t, then it must be in some way related to the planned corporate structure right?

As for the gripe with there being an overlap, there does tend to be an overlap in these situations, but the club was already dormant by then which actually means AFC waited longer than most phoenix clubs before forming.

AFC should never been seen as a threat, that damage was already done. If a new club at level 10 of the pyramid is a threat to your league one side, you’ve got a huge problem, and it’s not with the new club. That’s seven divisions between the two.
Click to expand...
Oh AFC was set up after Bury got expelled not before so it wasn't a case of a league 1 club and a NW counties? It was a club without a league heavily in debt with a 4 million pound mortgage on the ground in the hands of a chancer who bought the club for a pound from the guy who ruined the club and was trying to get the supporters club to pay 1 million for him to sell it to them, whilst the supporters club was trying to get financial help and fund raise then the other guys set up AFC, I mean they say it's practical which it probably was and the other side are saying they have abandoned the club they are supposed to support, I can see both sides of the argument but what I can't see is a resolution and a way forward and that's all that matters
 
Dogtanian said:
Oh AFC was set up after Bury got expelled not before so it wasn't a case of a league 1 club and a NW counties? It was a club without a league heavily in debt with a 4 million pound mortgage on the ground in the hands of a chancer who bought the club for a pound from the guy who ruined the club and was trying to get the supporters club to pay 1 million for him to sell it to them, whilst the supporters club was trying to get financial help and fund raise then the other guys set up AFC, I mean they say it's practical which it probably was and the other side are saying they have abandoned the club they are supposed to support, I can see both sides of the argument but what I can't see is a resolution and a way forward and that's all that matters
Click to expand...
The resolution is that AFC Bury move into Gigg Lane and try to get back in the league. The AFC mob have set up a team and found a league while the BFC mob seem to have done bugger all other than referring to AFC as "The Fakers" rather than the Shakers. Oh fucking hilarious.
There's a team without a ground and a ground without a team. The solution is bloody obvious and those who run the North West Counties League should be banning anybody associated with either entity who is putting their own interests ahead of the interests of the club.
 
East Level 2 said:
The resolution is that AFC Bury move into Gigg Lane and try to get back in the league. The AFC mob have set up a team and found a league while the BFC mob seem to have done bugger all other than referring to AFC as "The Fakers" rather than the Shakers. Oh fucking hilarious.
There's a team without a ground and a ground without a team. The solution is bloody obvious and those who run the North West Counties League should be banning anybody associated with either entity who is putting their own interests ahead of the interests of the club.
Click to expand...
I mean that's a bit harsh they have raised quite a bit, secured Gigg lane and held a few charity games, yes the merge is perfect but the sides don't get along and they will be far too much Billy big balls to move aside for the benefit of things, it's a fucking disgrace and the FA are as much to blame for being shit with the fit and proper persons check, it seems they only do that if your owners are foreign and have a colour they don't like
 
Dogtanian said:
I mean that's a bit harsh they have raised quite a bit, secured Gigg lane and held a few charity games, yes the merge is perfect but the sides don't get along and they will be far too much Billy big balls to move aside for the benefit of things, it's a fucking disgrace and the FA are as much to blame for being shit with the fit and proper persons check, it seems they only do that if your owners are foreign and have a colour they don't like
Click to expand...
The fit and proper person test is only good if a prospective owner has committed some form of business offence prior to buying the club. In some cases they will allow people that fail the test to own clubs as the alternative is the club being declared bankrupt.
Once in place there is bugger all the FA or EFL can do if the owner then runs the club into the ground. Even if they commit an offence they can't be forced to sell the club unless a suitable buyer comes forward, and that was extremely unlikely given the state Bury were in.
As for foreign owners; the FA and PL only became concerned when we proved to be a threat to clubs that generate most TV revenue. That would have been the case whatever nationality our owners were.
 
Dogtanian said:
Oh AFC was set up after Bury got expelled not before so it wasn't a case of a league 1 club and a NW counties? It was a club without a league heavily in debt with a 4 million pound mortgage on the ground in the hands of a chancer who bought the club for a pound from the guy who ruined the club and was trying to get the supporters club to pay 1 million for him to sell it to them, whilst the supporters club was trying to get financial help and fund raise then the other guys set up AFC, I mean they say it's practical which it probably was and the other side are saying they have abandoned the club they are supposed to support, I can see both sides of the argument but what I can't see is a resolution and a way forward and that's all that matters
Click to expand...
I did acknowledge that, but that’s kinda the point as well. The damage was already done. They have no rightful reason to be irked about the establishment of AFCB.

It’s not AFCB’s fault anything that happened to BFC.
 
paska said:
I did acknowledge that, but that’s kinda the point as well. The damage was already done. They have no rightful reason to be irked about the establishment of AFCB.

It’s not AFCB’s fault anything that happened to BFC.
Click to expand...
That's the reason Moston Rag Socks fans don't get why they are disliked.
They align themselves with AFC Wimbledon when the formation of both clubs are poles apart. Bury, like Wimbledon had their club taken away from them.
Where as the Splitters formed out of spite and by opportunists who pulled in a few thousand gullible romantasists who foolishly parted with their cash that they'll never see again
 
Mad Eyed Screamer said:
That's the reason Moston Rag Socks fans don't get why they are disliked.
They align themselves with AFC Wimbledon when the formation of both clubs are poles apart. Bury, like Wimbledon had their club taken away from them.
Where as the Splitters formed out of spite and by opportunists who pulled in a few thousand gullible romantasists who foolishly parted with their cash that they'll never see again
Click to expand...
Who are Moston Rag Socks and who are the Splitters?

FCUOM?

Bury is a similar situation to Wimbledon. FCUOM is quite different
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.