I'll take a tenner at 600-1, shit I'd take a tenner at 60-1 but if your mate gave me those odds he'd be a shithouse! ;)johnychacha said:BigJoe#1 said:johnychacha said:After reading the article in the Sun yesterday , on how City can still win the title , I got all giddy and backed us . Luckily my mate who has just opened his own bookies( and a red c&2T) gave us 600-1
C'mon Stoke
C'mon City
We'll fight to the end
Stick £100 for me at that price...please
Haa haa , He's got an interview with some betting magazine in the next week or so , he reckons he's going to give us a mention about the superb price he gave us , disallusioned (where's spell checker) tw@ts , He also called us :~)
I don't recognise the game from this account though!NoahCity said:They seem to have regained their cool :(...<a class="postlink" href="http://www.redcafe.net/f6/get-grip-368829/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.redcafe.net/f6/get-grip-368829/</a>
We had 15 shots on goal to their 10. 10 shots from inside the box compared to 6 by City players. United had 55% of the possession. passed the ball more accurately (82% vs 76%) and made more passes in total (443 vs 353) We made more tackles and won a higher % of tackles attempted. Pretty much the only stat where City looked the better team was in goals scored, one of which should not have counted. Obviously, stats need to be interpreted in context and I don't think United dominated as much as you'd think from reading those statistics. I saw it as an even game, with both sides approaching the game with their usual, differing styles. We set up to soak up pressure and counter-attack (the way we fucking ALWAYS approach tough games like this, something that gets promptly forgotten by the hive mind on here this season the moment we fail to pick up all three points prompting hysterical outbursts about "cowardice" from the team/manager) and City tried to find space in the middle of the park for Silva and Toure to pass and probe with Tevez and later (spit) Aguero trying to pull our defenders out of place with clever movement. For most of the game the two teams cancelled each other out, with neither keeper making any kind of meaningful save until we gifted (oh Ryan) City their first (offside) goal, scored from a set-piece and eventually got undone by a moment of individual brilliance. What definitely did not happen, despite thousands of words posted on here to the contrary, was City comprehensively outplaying United or somehow dominating the game. That's just hysterical nonsense. Last season we got our arses handed to us by City, last night we most definitely did not.
George Hannah said:I don't recognise the game from this account though!NoahCity said:They seem to have regained their cool :(...<a class="postlink" href="http://www.redcafe.net/f6/get-grip-368829/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.redcafe.net/f6/get-grip-368829/</a>
We had 15 shots on goal to their 10. 10 shots from inside the box compared to 6 by City players. United had 55% of the possession. passed the ball more accurately (82% vs 76%) and made more passes in total (443 vs 353) We made more tackles and won a higher % of tackles attempted. Pretty much the only stat where City looked the better team was in goals scored, one of which should not have counted. Obviously, stats need to be interpreted in context and I don't think United dominated as much as you'd think from reading those statistics. I saw it as an even game, with both sides approaching the game with their usual, differing styles. We set up to soak up pressure and counter-attack (the way we fucking ALWAYS approach tough games like this, something that gets promptly forgotten by the hive mind on here this season the moment we fail to pick up all three points prompting hysterical outbursts about "cowardice" from the team/manager) and City tried to find space in the middle of the park for Silva and Toure to pass and probe with Tevez and later (spit) Aguero trying to pull our defenders out of place with clever movement. For most of the game the two teams cancelled each other out, with neither keeper making any kind of meaningful save until we gifted (oh Ryan) City their first (offside) goal, scored from a set-piece and eventually got undone by a moment of individual brilliance. What definitely did not happen, despite thousands of words posted on here to the contrary, was City comprehensively outplaying United or somehow dominating the game. That's just hysterical nonsense. Last season we got our arses handed to us by City, last night we most definitely did not.
I think the end was getting beat by the blue dippers but a Stoke win on Sunday could be a new beginning....Rorz88 said:I have us down to win it on goal difference, thats with them drawing at the weekend. I think they could get done 1-0. Heres hoping !
We'll fight to the end!