Carroll's ban upheld

Vienna_70

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 Jun 2009
Messages
40,778
Location
100, 32, 106, +79, 19
Team supported
Treble Winners 2022/23.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26039222" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26039222</a>





Andy Carroll: West Ham striker's red card appeal rejected

West Ham striker Andy Carroll has failed to overturn his red card against Swansea on Saturday after the Football Association dismissed his appeal.
The 25-year-old was sent off after clashing with Swans defender Chico Flores during his side's 2-0 win.
He will now miss the Hammers' Premier League games against Aston Villa, Norwich and Southampton.
In apparent reaction to the decision, Carroll, who set up both goals on Saturday, tweeted: "Disgraceful."

A year to forget

In the 12 months from the start of March 2013 to the end of February 2014, Andy Carroll will have played only 15 games, scoring four goals.
According to the FA, West Ham failed to prove to a three-man panel that referee Howard Webb had made "an obvious error" in dismissing Carroll after the forward's arm hit Flores's forehead.
However, West Ham manager Sam Allardyce was certain that Webb made a mistake.
"There has to be somebody to look at that in the cold light of day and say that is certainly not a red card," he said on Saturday.
Allardyce refused to comment on Flores's reaction to the challenge, although several of his players protested at the time that the Spaniard had exaggerated the contact made by Carroll.
Swansea manager Brian Laudrup said the decision had been "a bit harsh".
Carroll, who has made only five appearances this season and is yet to score after a lengthy recovery from injury, will next be available for the trip to Everton on 1 March.
With Modibo Maiga loaned out to QPR, the Hammers' striking options are limited to on-loan Italian Marco Borriello and Carlton Cole.
West Ham are 18th in the Premier League, one point from safety, with 14 games remaining.

I didn't think it would be. There is clearly intent on Carroll's part. There was no need for him to swing his arm as far around as he did and he is obviously trying to land one on Flores.
 
And it also sends a clear message to young kids that if someone brushes your hair your entitled to con the ref and hold your face in extreme agony.

It was a tussle and a yellow at worst,
The Swansea manager even admitted it wasn't a red.

The FA have to be seen to back there man Webb and were never going to show some balls and punish the real cheat, Chico Flores.

Joke decision
 
Markt85 said:
And it also sends a clear message to young kids that if someone brushes your hair your entitled to con the ref and hold your face in extreme agony.

It was a tussle and a yellow at worst,
The Swansea manager even admitted it wasn't a red.

The FA have to be seen to back there man Webb and were never going to show some balls and punish the real cheat, Chico Flores.

Joke decision

He made a deliberate swipe with his arm at the opposition player.
You can't do that contact or not.

If it is a city player in the wrong i will call it just the same.
 
Markt85 said:
And it also sends a clear message to young kids that if someone brushes your hair your entitled to con the ref and hold your face in extreme agony.

It was a tussle and a yellow at worst,
The Swansea manager even admitted it wasn't a red.

The FA have to be seen to back there man Webb and were never going to show some balls and punish the real cheat, Chico Flores.

Joke decision

It is a joke decision. It pales into insignificance compared to some of the shit Rooney's got away with!
 
Markt85 said:
And it also sends a clear message to young kids that if someone brushes your hair your entitled to con the ref and hold your face in extreme agony.

It was a tussle and a yellow at worst,
The Swansea manager even admitted it wasn't a red.

The FA have to be seen to back there man Webb and were never going to show some balls and punish the real cheat, Chico Flores.

Joke decision
Isn't it an independent panel and not the F A who made the decision
Your right though Flores should be punished.
 
Shame he didn't get done for the attempted nut on Panty....as well as a forearm on one of our defenders. Reap what you sow....

Minimum contact but the intent was there so right decision.
 
The cookie monster said:
Markt85 said:
And it also sends a clear message to young kids that if someone brushes your hair your entitled to con the ref and hold your face in extreme agony.

It was a tussle and a yellow at worst,
The Swansea manager even admitted it wasn't a red.

The FA have to be seen to back there man Webb and were never going to show some balls and punish the real cheat, Chico Flores.

Joke decision
Isn't it an independent panel and not the F A who made the decision
Your right though Flores should be punished.

I also think Flores should be punished, just like that - was it Watford? - player at Etihad recently. He was lying on the ground as if he'd been pole-axed, but as soon as the ref told him to get up, he was running around like a Spring lamb.

It deserved a booking at least.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.