supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,914
I've seen some excellent attempts to twist this decision. Conn and Roan. Conn the less said the better, just bitter.
Roan - "UEFA says CAS found “insufficient conclusive evidence to uphold all the conclusions” - (not no evidence!)".
Brilliant journalism. Has anyone been to court before?! We wouldn't have been through this if there wasn't any evidence! Absolute clown. Evidence can consist of all sorts of rubbish. If it isn't conclusive then it's thrown out. If the emails pointed to an issue in our accounts then we'd have lost! But the evidence they put forward was fucking nonsense. Shit evidence is the same as no evidence!
Roan - "UEFA says CAS found “insufficient conclusive evidence to uphold all the conclusions” - (not no evidence!)".
Brilliant journalism. Has anyone been to court before?! We wouldn't have been through this if there wasn't any evidence! Absolute clown. Evidence can consist of all sorts of rubbish. If it isn't conclusive then it's thrown out. If the emails pointed to an issue in our accounts then we'd have lost! But the evidence they put forward was fucking nonsense. Shit evidence is the same as no evidence!