If I remember correctly we've threatened him with legal action before and when we didn’t follow up on it he mocked us. If my memory is correct and that is what happened he probably thinks he can continue spouting vitriolic bile as he thinks we are too weak to follow up on our threats.Tebas has crossed the line with these latest quotes, if we don't threaten him with legal action now then I doubt we ever will with anyone.
Thats why I think the final report of findings will show just how ridiculous the original punishment was. How we use that is an interesting question.I have thought about this.
That punishment was so extreme,even i started doubting,thinking we must be seriously banged to rights.
Maybe they wanted to damage the brand.
They wanted neutrals to automatically assume serious guilt,by issuing an unprecedentedly harsh sentence.
That sentence would not have even reflected the crime,had a crime been proven.
It was like hanging someone for stealing an Apple.
How much of this campaign was controlled by Parry,Gill, i wonder.
You know one click equates to less than a penny in ad revenue.Not sure I said he wasn't, and it's not against the CoC to post a few salient points, just the whole article due to copyright, I refuse to give give clickbait newspapers ad revenue, and it applies to them all. The daily fail in particular for personal reasons, most of it's reporters (won't call them journalists) make shit up, and run a racist line, including in the past against a City player, for that, they deserve no clicks from here imho, but you feel free to support them.
You know one click equates to less than a penny in ad revenue.
I never understand the whole “I’m not clicking that” malarkey and the need to announce it. It makes absolutely no difference to The Mail whether one person does or doesn’t.
He may want to look at how much more City bring in through TV for both PL and CL than United if he doesn’t to look a ****."City haven't signed with their own resources, like Manchester United do, who bring in money through television or sponsors.
It really doesn’t. Cleavers not clicking on any article posted on here for an entire season wouldn’t even starve them of the cost of a cappuccino.All adds up though
Clicking is no big deal but contributing to other football sites brings in traffic. That's the important aspect. Don't contribute to their journalism. In theory I like the idea of a national fans network but not one that sits in a commercial framework which carries opinion pieces that are hostile to City.All adds up though how many articles a day a week a month? Plus if those got to site they get sponsors on that site on how much traffic passes those sites.